Message from @Citizen Z
Discord ID: 486032352137707540
--or go finish playing in your sandbox ...
No. I am too tired for this shit now.
Texting is ok
DEBATE
**How to kill chat 101 with Chan Chan**
Smh
😂
Nothing but they should seek treatment and kept away from children
I have a debate
What constitutes an effective troll?
What should the goal of a troll be?
Meow
Are there good trolls?
teehee 😊 yep
oh , and heh.. my man @shroominati ! ..with the "weeeee"'s and the "wheeeees" ; )
-- lols,.. my man shroomi has been known for that, for a while, ..huh bro ; ) giggles
*Yep, i used to see ya postin **_weeeeeee_** , a lot back in the day/s : D
.
__Yeah, (for any onlookers) ...sorry on the (green) "Trollface" (Gif pic up there)..teehee, ..but, ..only reason i even posted that was because of the conversation right before/above it__ ↑ 👌
and thought it would be funny : )
k ✔
thanks -- jus syn
.
evolution has nothing to do with the globe
way to totally misrepresent it 👍
That's not how evolution works
You guys. Evolution is dumbest thing ever thought of
Dont fall for such fuckery
okay if you can explain evolution, that'd be great
@Citizen Z 🤔 i cant write in <#484515915069784085>
can now
thank
Yw
Citizen I know quite a bit about Evolution I do trust that it holds true and is observable
I think I've discussed it with you before
The only actual scientifically verifiable type of *Evolution* is microevolution, which is basically just smaller evolutionary changes. For an example, dogs still breed dogs, but there can be different types of dog breeds. Anything else is just pseudoscientific hoax stories for the gullible to hook line and sink, and to praise their new apeman religion under the false notion of so called; " 21st century science" which has very little to do with observation, experimentation and repetition these days.
I disagree with that, but I find the distinction between macro and micro evolution interesting. It seems to me there shouldn't be a distincton between the two as they both act the same way. Making the distinction between macro and micro shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how evolution works, as the small changes bulid up and over time become bigger.
Also macro is the one you are arguing against in your last message, micro is the small changes
@Citizen Z what’s up why am I tagged
Sorry been travelling for a couple days not watching discord
Debate
Hey man. Im a truther
The mechanism of macro and microevolution is the same. Who admitts that thee is microevolution admitts also that there is macroevolution.
There is no point in mutation that says "Stop". It goes on and on forever.
And we see the traces back for million of years. Genetics and DNA proves evolution perfectly.
But sure Citizen won't get it because he doesn't understands it.
Even if you reject the fossil record we see speciation (creation of new species from older ones) within our lifetime