Claiming such figures is basically talking out of your ass

What do you mean by wet tissues

you are literally talking out of your ass

U said about that earlier

answer him

do you even know that most scientists believed that the earth was only a few hundred thousand years old right up till the 19th century?

they're not talking out of their ass

it's based on scientific findings

And okay, if you provide enough evidence to disprove geology I will retract my claim of saying the earth is 4 billion years old

If anyone believes the dinosaurs are millions of years old. They have been completely brainwashed. They can only carbon date bones up to a few thousand years old. The rest is a guess. They still find flesh on some bones. It don't matter what it is. 65 million years is a long time and nothing could last that long. They use 65 million years to explain how something came from nothing and people buy this bullshit. The Bing Bang theory was invented by a Catholic Priest called, Georges Lemaître.

fucking hell

why are all of you idiots like this

Excellent argument

you've been avoiding what he's been asking

@Hugh i never imagined people were _this_ intellectually undeveloped

Okay hold on

You can't disprove all Geology together, you got to be more specific.

seriously all they do is vomit word salad and ignore everyone

Lemme say skmething

Hugh, go punch a wall if you can't control your tempers. Either say something that actually has any meaning, or just stay quiet for now.

I'm having a discussion with baller

Do u know that there are other isotopes used for dating?

@Livxly Dxll the discussion involves him asking you questions, and you responding with even more bizarre conspiratorial crap.

Yes carbon 14 has a half life if 5000ish years

if you were reading? we've been trying to get you to answer baller and you keep deflecting

But uranium 238 and 235 has half lives of more than a million years

For dinosaurs we use uranium

Yes, of course there are different isotopes that can be used as a method for dating things back. Like radiogenic, anstropogenic, cosmogenic, and other methods to do so.

Baller,

Before you make a claim,

Yes?

it's good to show me the data

The numbers, the figures, the exact experiment

U want data that the half lives of uranium 235 is these many years?
Okay but which source are u gonna trust

It's easy to just read a book and memorize it, but how about you go actually one step further and see how one comes down to a such conclusion.

My issue is not with the source, and you can choose your favorite *peer-reviewed* articles for all I care right now,

choose the one that you think is the best suitable.

That is not an exepriment, it's called a description.

I'm still waiting.

U want the experiment that measured the half life?