Message from @Ætos
Discord ID: 571845120404619300
You are thinking to much into it
But that picture doesn’t actually disprove what I am referring to.
Not really
It’s just one specific picture that I am curious about.
Its proving that area is locally level
Yes, but by that standard I can prove a ball is locally level by balancing a level on the surface of that ball.
Which is sort of true, but also not.
Now put water on the ball and level it out
Those are very different (water on a ball Vs. Level on ground).
I think you’re interpreting my questions in a larger scale than I mean for, Oh well.
Im saying water is level and doesn't bend around a spinning ball in a vacuum. Also, overall, the land is flat.
Yeah, I’m not even disagreeing that almost everything is locally flat.
If you look over large distances of land, you will find it doesnt have curvature consistent with a 24901 ball.
My only question was regarding a single, very specific image and its goal.
And kind of also pointing out how that one picture doesn’t really show anything.
Yes. Sheeples pic proved that area was also flat
I guess I’m still not getting my point across, but good talk anyways, Citizen.
I know your point
Maybe I’m just not understanding your answer, then.
Still not a bad discussion
Better than the crap in <#484514023698726912>, by a mile.
I appreciate your time, Z
You think sheeples picture is a small area and not proof of a flat earth or disproving a globe. Which you would be correct. It does however, prove that area is locally level
Wow
That’s actually exactly the kind of explanation I was looking for
*Problem solved, lmao*
Lol
That makes more sense, now
Its about what we can prove thru experiment
Not what we assume or guess
When I get back to my dorm in a few days, I’ll grab a level and show you what I mean by a counter demonstration.
Not much point in me trying to explain it until then
Salt flats for instance..400 square miles..level
This is nice, btw, Z
Kind of like old times
Haha
Yeah bro
XD
bolivia salt flats ..4,000* sq mi