Message from @Ætos
Discord ID: 571841967764537362
My point about the level picture is that I can balance a level on top of a ball and show the same thing.
And I’m not talking about Bedford
We are open to see any other experiments
Just Sheeple’s picture
Yes. Its a great picture
Show the simplicity
It is a nice picture, lol
I just don’t see it proving a point,
If you can disprove it then okay
I have a level in my dorm
Obviously in that section of soil, its flat
When I get back after finals studying Monday, I can show a picture of what I mean.
All water is flat
So you have an angled surface?
I’m not talking about that, Z, lmao
I am
Mostly flat
Then we have a fundamental disagreement of premise and there’s no point continuing, lol
I’m not arguing against FE,
So water curves with a level?
It demonstrates that area of the ground is level
Because I can do the same thing but put the level on a ball.
Its not hard to understand
I would get the same result as long as I balance the level.
A third grader could grasp that concept
Oh, that I realize.
You are thinking to much into it
But that picture doesn’t actually disprove what I am referring to.
Not really
It’s just one specific picture that I am curious about.
Its proving that area is locally level
Yes, but by that standard I can prove a ball is locally level by balancing a level on the surface of that ball.
Which is sort of true, but also not.
Now put water on the ball and level it out
Those are very different (water on a ball Vs. Level on ground).
I think you’re interpreting my questions in a larger scale than I mean for, Oh well.
Im saying water is level and doesn't bend around a spinning ball in a vacuum. Also, overall, the land is flat.
Yeah, I’m not even disagreeing that almost everything is locally flat.
If you look over large distances of land, you will find it doesnt have curvature consistent with a 24901 ball.