Message from @Citizen Z
Discord ID: 571841621306507285
We have testable results
Yeah, actually, I don’t understand the “level” point.
Water always finds and maintains level. Prove it wrong.
I understand how Bedford level shows flat water.
I’m just saying I don’t get how whipping out a level would prove something is flat.
It just proves that something is level, lol.
Cuz it shows level
What experiment do you have to disprove it?
My point about the level picture is that I can balance a level on top of a ball and show the same thing.
And I’m not talking about Bedford
We are open to see any other experiments
Just Sheeple’s picture
Yes. Its a great picture
Show the simplicity
It is a nice picture, lol
I just don’t see it proving a point,
If you can disprove it then okay
I have a level in my dorm
Obviously in that section of soil, its flat
When I get back after finals studying Monday, I can show a picture of what I mean.
So you have an angled surface?
I’m not talking about that, Z, lmao
I am
Mostly flat
Then we have a fundamental disagreement of premise and there’s no point continuing, lol
I’m not arguing against FE,
So water curves with a level?
I’m just curious how that “level on ground” picture demonstrates anything
It demonstrates that area of the ground is level
Because I can do the same thing but put the level on a ball.
Its not hard to understand
I would get the same result as long as I balance the level.
A third grader could grasp that concept
Oh, that I realize.
You are thinking to much into it
But that picture doesn’t actually disprove what I am referring to.
Not really
It’s just one specific picture that I am curious about.
Its proving that area is locally level
Yes, but by that standard I can prove a ball is locally level by balancing a level on the surface of that ball.