Message from @Green Knight
Discord ID: 563781426953191424
I mean if it's so close it would be easy to get too
There’s literally a document where nasa says they made a vacuum-safe nozzle to produce the force needed to project off itself to travel in vacuum space.
Wait
If the moon is encompassed by earth’s atmosphere, it proves they’re lying.
There’s no need for such a thing.
So hundreds of astronaunts went high in the space and they saw the earth round...
I mean I think at that distance the atmosphere is super thin but still must not be a technical vacuum
They all looked out curved windows.
Or they never went to space and Actors
@Derek Nelson i guess you don't believe in the ISS right?
Ok so what is the "ice wall"?
Im kinda new here
Ohhhhhhh
The ice wall is the shore of Antarctica but it goes all around the world
It's the border of the flat earth
@Derek Nelson can I have permission to post images?
There Has to be a way to solve this question once and for all
The fact that it's even a debate says there must be something wrong with the current model
Nasa was created the same year after this encyclopedia was made.
The same year after?
That's really cool but looks like it's talking about a dome made of ice
Not a firmament dome but an ice structure
Nobody calls a mountain a dome..
Cuz it’s not a dome
Well it's a dome of ice
On a mountain
Because the mountains are taller than 13k feet
It’s all speculative anyway.
Even in Antarctica
Point is, a flat earth doesn’t need to disprove what can’t be proven. Aka, curvature.
But it can be proven
No.
How can we prove curvature? That is the entire question
Well if you do any amount of research from a credible source than you will see that the earth is not flat
Nasa isn’t credible?