no no no

bois

u got it all wrong

the earth is obviously a triangle

<:smart:484956754489376781>

Please no trolling.

yes master

also this server should make a trolls chat, where everybody there is a troll, and a troll roll, ooh that rhymes :D)

I have that. But you won't be able to talk here anymore.

I can give you access to that. Just dont troll here.

ok

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nA0AGiUEMbc @GIANDING

Number one you have what's called visibility. We have many things in the atmosphere such as moisture that prevent you from seeing infinitely.
WHAT CAUSES GREAT VISIBILITY?
http://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/276/

Even if you went to a tall mountain and took away everything such as moisture, humidity, fog, clouds, rain, snow, pollen and dirt particulates out or even just removed the atmosphere completely, (which is impossible) there is still what's called optical slant and angular resolution.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_resolution

Remember there is probably 5 storms between north American and Europe. How many storms are between your nearest mountain and Antarctica?

^
If the moon is thousands of miles up, why can we see the moon in daytime even through the entire atmosphere, but the world record for farthest distance seen is, I think 275 miles?

If we can't see infinitely far on a flat Earth due to debris, humidity, etc... why can we see craters on the moon in daytime using telescopes when the moon is at least a thousand miles up, but we can hardly see over 250 miles looking straight even when using telescopes?

@Citizen Z Thx

You can only see the moon if its clear and no clouds

I dont think the moon is as far as its claimed to be.

Looking sideways has more atmosphere to look through.

When you look sideways, the angles of light become more and more shallow as you look further and things disappear much quicker

I mean.

What was it?

Like 400 distance closer to the sub and 400x smaller or something.

Sun*

It allows eclipses

The earth is a trapiziod

uhuh

Do flat earthers have an explanation for why there is a Southern polar star but no South pole on any flat Earth models?

If we were on a spinning ball we would see straight lines across the sky not perfect circuits around the magnetic poles as if it's a magnetic field.

From that very last image, im guessing that's supposed to be a globe and the lines are showing the star trails

Those are straight lines from that perspective, but that isn't the same perspective of the stars that we have standing on Earth.

The lines are straight from the perspective of, let's say, floating in space away from Earth with the stars that close, but from the perspective of being on Earth, you can see the lines from the trails, and the ones away from your near center vision, about to the left and right, let's say the north and south poles were to the left and right, are visibly circles and not straight lines.

It's hard to explain, and is mostly visual

I explained that poorly, but a better version is that it's like hula hoops. If you have a hula hoop and hold it out towards you perfectly horizontally, it can look like a straight line. But when you raise the hula hoop above your head, it's a circle.

So by saying the star trails are like a hula hoop you are saying the stars are moving and the earth is stationary. Either way the lines are straight.

Cuz if you wanted to model it right. You would need to say we are standing on the outside of the hulu hoop, looking outward, in which case the lines would be straight also. I dont think you understand how simple this is. Star trails prove we are not on a spinning ball. Doesn't mean it's a flat earth. Just not a spinning ball.

The lines are curved because the earth is spinning, those images you provided support the claim that the earth is found

round