Message from @Technomatrix

Discord ID: 557341419363106817


2019-03-18 23:09:29 UTC  

Name one person not related to government that sees the curve

2019-03-18 23:10:10 UTC  

ancient sailors for one

2019-03-18 23:10:30 UTC  

like if you're going across an ocean you can literally see it. this has been documented for centuries

2019-03-18 23:11:33 UTC  

They never saw a curve

2019-03-18 23:12:13 UTC  

okay they were all government spies who time traveled to fool us in the modern age

2019-03-18 23:12:17 UTC  

Its called optical slant. It looks as if something is disappearing from the bottom up, but its just the way light and the eye or lenses works

2019-03-18 23:12:34 UTC  

Seeing something disappear is not seeing a curve

2019-03-18 23:12:49 UTC  

sure, buddy, go with the explanation that makes less sense

2019-03-18 23:12:50 UTC  

The angular resolution of the eye is .02 degrees

2019-03-18 23:13:09 UTC  

It doesn't make less sense. Look into it

2019-03-18 23:13:11 UTC  

"The angular resolution of the eye is .02 degrees" how would you know this?

2019-03-18 23:13:12 UTC  

I dare ya.

2019-03-18 23:13:39 UTC  

nah I'll prove how it makes less sense. how would you know this "The angular resolution of the eye is .02 degrees"

2019-03-18 23:14:44 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/557341148432302140/Screenshot_20190318-161425_Chrome.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/557341148432302141/kan_ch26_f001.png

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/557341148956459028/retinaimage.png

2019-03-18 23:15:14 UTC  

Yiu are not seeing a curve. You are just losing resolved light

2019-03-18 23:15:18 UTC  

If the angular resolution is 0.02 degrees, which it approximately is, then we should literally see over 10,000 miles from a commercial flight by known phenomenon of optical slant.
Of course, we don't, because earth curve.

2019-03-18 23:15:24 UTC  

Huh

2019-03-18 23:15:37 UTC  

Where did you get that info?

2019-03-18 23:15:45 UTC  

Ever hear of visibility?

2019-03-18 23:15:49 UTC  

You can do the calculations by assuming a flat plane and a 0.02 degree resolution

2019-03-18 23:16:01 UTC  

K show me the calculations.

2019-03-18 23:16:12 UTC  

Alright, just a second...

2019-03-18 23:16:16 UTC  

Then realize there is something called visibility.

2019-03-18 23:16:24 UTC  
2019-03-18 23:16:37 UTC  

You forgot about that

2019-03-18 23:16:49 UTC  

Plus, we do see further when up higher.

2019-03-18 23:17:04 UTC  

Waiting for your calculations

2019-03-18 23:18:02 UTC  

h/tan(0.02 degrees) = d
h is observer height, and d distance to horizon. It gets about 3.2 miles at 6 foot observer height, which is more or less accurate. But at altitudes like 40,000 feet, it blows up.

2019-03-18 23:18:21 UTC  

@Citizen Z got up for a sec, glad you responded. why do you trust Wikipedia, a wiki anyone can edit, as a reliable source for "The angular resolution of the eye is .02 degrees"?

2019-03-18 23:18:52 UTC  

@Technomatrix so you discount visibility?

2019-03-18 23:18:56 UTC  

Visibility, sure, but on a clear day, we should see much father than we do in reality

2019-03-18 23:19:05 UTC  

@Technomatrix do you live inside a vacuum?

2019-03-18 23:19:16 UTC  

On a globe, it makes sense. On a flat earth, not so much

2019-03-18 23:19:19 UTC  

@Technomatrix prove it.

2019-03-18 23:19:52 UTC  

well, I got perspective accounted for. Now I'll just need footage from commercial flights

2019-03-18 23:20:13 UTC  

@vazorium it's not just wiki

2019-03-18 23:20:26 UTC  

@Citizen Z what primary source would you trust and why?

2019-03-18 23:22:14 UTC  

So you disagree?
The angular resolution of the eye is not .02 degrees?

2019-03-18 23:22:54 UTC  

@vazorium please show me your findings

2019-03-18 23:23:10 UTC  

I'm interested