Do you really think I'm simply unaware of basic physics?

The point is that you're simply taking experts' word for it rather than demanding tangible and reproducible evidence.

Reproducible evidence? It’s been reproduced thousands of times with each of our planets in our solar system. Also, what better explanation do you have?

No it hasn't. You are assuming that the movement of the "planets" is caused by the same force that causes things to fall on earth.

That's where the evidence is lacking.

I dont have a better explanation. But my lack of a better explanation is not proof that your speculative mathematics provide one.

I think that the "experiment" used to derive the gravitational constant is bogus.

Without solid evidence of "Big G", the heliocentric model is merely speculative.

I’m not asumimg it. It has been proven. We are able to measure the gravitation lull and orbit around objects. These equations have been created by newton himself.

Pull*

I gtg to bed

I’m tired

I’ll see y’all tomorrow

The equations are not proof. You have to include a large number of assumptions to arrive at those conclusions.

bye

equations are not proof. obviously. what makes you think I dont understand the equations?

The American School system is garbage and needs a complete overhaul

why?

many obvious reasons

patriotism, fake history, multiple choice tests

there is no such thing as fake history

history is history

its already proven

sorry mate @shiro

lol

do you believe everything thats in the news as well? @MagicalLuuk

no

ur weck

then why do you assume the news in the past were correct?

stupidity

no

sorry

mate thats not how it works

how come?

example: 911 was a lie. it was shown in tv therefore ppl believe it and thats why it will be in the future history books. now how can you be sure stuff like that or similar never happened before?

9/11 was not a lie

My uncle was at the scene

Or one of my uncles

And he was nearly killed