Message from @Alexandre
Discord ID: 567578549587017728
Hmm nope
so its only directed to men
and they are the only gender that talks over a women
I don’t agree with the concept of “mansplaining” due to how easily it can be applied to any situation. “Mansplaining” inherently assumes a man’s intentions as being negative or sexist. That leads to the issue of potentially demonizing men. The most ironic case is when a man talks down to a woman, and then another man comes to the woman’s defense. The defending man has good intentions, but since he is talking for the woman and “mansplaining” to protect her, he is therefore somehow also bad, even if he knows he has more experience dealing with the aggressor and knows how to talk to him. Things like that are my issue with the concept.
Jesus, I made that long
lol
I agree
Just don't explain for women
Problem solved
yeah but women also explain over men
Smh
and feminists are only directing it to men
Because that is what men do
Kek
wtf
so every men does that
and no women
Looking down at the other sex or simply dismissive due to the fact of them being female
You just found the issue I have with this, Alexander, as proven by Soldz’ comment.
I'm just explaining the word <:hahAA:358306291070009345>
And you also demonized men in the process.
“Because that is what men do”
Which just proves my point.
Unfortunately.
so a woman can talk over men
but a man cant
talk over women
Honestly, sure, I don’t even have an issue with that.
That's not what I said
ik
My only issue is that the entire point of this concept is to demonize men and only men.
me to
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
We should all let each other speak but as I said it isn't about that it is about people looking downing or dismissing
Or assuming
In this case assuming the woman to be inferior.
Or (also in this case) assuming the man to have hostile and malicious intentions.
Yeah stop explaining for me goth magnet
<:emm:518631217898323975>
I’m not explaining for you