maybe its 2 BS articles

Exactly the same

One of them is bs.

I didn't make up the term soy boy

some other people did

Ik

pretty much indicates that being on soy feminizes men

...no

There was one case where this guy drank three quarts a day and he got a hormone disorder.

https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1350057-soy-boy

Balanced by 32 different studies of hundreds of people that showed that soy is fine, if you don’t take too much of it.

Oh yeah now KnowYourMeme is evidence?

I did a reverse image search on the guy in the article

appearantly its a powerful tool in evidential circles

equal to your 32 studies

Waow

*fake studies paid for by soy shills promoting soy to feminize men in an evil conspiracy

Oh yeah sure just call them all fake

Couldn't find any coverage in the daily mail or the sun only the same article posted again and again word for word on different natural health websites

No, you’re just in denial.

Calling them fake does not make them fake.

wait, you think $4 billion dollar company is a powerful company. pfff ahahahaahah

lets take a walk down memory lane

what did the cigarette company do when studies came out that it wasn't healthy to smoke?

Same thing the oil companies are doing about climate change

<:smart:484956754489376781>

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2005/jun/02/thisweekssciencequestions.cancer

In 1951, the researchers wrote to 59,600 doctors and asked about their smoking habits. They kept a watch on the doctors' health and published the results in 1954 in a paper now deemed so important that the British Medical Journal reprinted the first page last June, 50 years after the original report.

so lets see, they figured this out in the 1970's but yet people were still smoking

wow, seems like once a company makes a lot of money selling something, they work to protect that cash cow and stiffle facts that say its unhealthy

you guys wait 50 years until they finally admit that its feminizing, I will act on the correct info now

you think a company worth $4 billion is a big company?

I think its a decent sized company, not necessarily "big"

its pretty small

I think it has backers who promote feminizing men, who have trillions

its matching a globalist agenda

anyway, most soy is used as animal feed, very little is actually consumed by people directly

I'm not buying that, your not only getting 1st hand exposure, but 2nd hand exposure as well

drinking milk that a cow who did SOY (gag)

so you advoid basically all meat then