Message from @The18thDoctor

Discord ID: 498487217589846046


2018-10-07 13:21:37 UTC  

32 studies

2018-10-07 13:21:43 UTC  

^

2018-10-07 13:23:34 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484515645258596369/498485539599548416/unknown.png

2018-10-07 13:24:15 UTC  

Good discussions

2018-10-07 13:25:16 UTC  

You know what’s really, really strange?

2018-10-07 13:26:17 UTC  

You

2018-10-07 13:26:30 UTC  

Gottem 😂 😂

2018-10-07 13:26:32 UTC  

These are two separate cases, right? So how did both people (the guy in Texas and the guy in London) both give the interviewer this phrase: “My penis—I won’t say it atrophied, but it was so flaccid that it looked very small in comparison with the way it used to be.”

2018-10-07 13:27:00 UTC  

The exact same one?

2018-10-07 13:27:30 UTC  

maybe its 2 BS articles

2018-10-07 13:27:39 UTC  

Exactly the same

2018-10-07 13:27:48 UTC  

One of them is bs.

2018-10-07 13:28:03 UTC  

I didn't make up the term soy boy

2018-10-07 13:28:11 UTC  

some other people did

2018-10-07 13:28:15 UTC  

Ik

2018-10-07 13:28:55 UTC  

pretty much indicates that being on soy feminizes men

2018-10-07 13:29:08 UTC  

...no

2018-10-07 13:29:29 UTC  

There was one case where this guy drank three quarts a day and he got a hormone disorder.

2018-10-07 13:30:14 UTC  

Balanced by 32 different studies of hundreds of people that showed that soy is fine, if you don’t take too much of it.

2018-10-07 13:30:26 UTC  

Oh yeah now KnowYourMeme is evidence?

2018-10-07 13:31:27 UTC  

I did a reverse image search on the guy in the article

2018-10-07 13:31:31 UTC  

appearantly its a powerful tool in evidential circles

2018-10-07 13:31:35 UTC  

equal to your 32 studies

2018-10-07 13:31:50 UTC  

Waow

2018-10-07 13:32:12 UTC  

*fake studies paid for by soy shills promoting soy to feminize men in an evil conspiracy

2018-10-07 13:32:24 UTC  

Oh yeah sure just call them all fake

2018-10-07 13:32:30 UTC  

Couldn't find any coverage in the daily mail or the sun only the same article posted again and again word for word on different natural health websites

2018-10-07 13:32:31 UTC  

No, you’re just in denial.

2018-10-07 13:32:41 UTC  

Calling them fake does not make them fake.

2018-10-07 13:34:38 UTC  

wait, you think $4 billion dollar company is a powerful company. pfff ahahahaahah

2018-10-07 13:35:19 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484515645258596369/498488499394183179/IMG_20181007_034032.jpg

2018-10-07 13:37:31 UTC  

lets take a walk down memory lane

2018-10-07 13:37:53 UTC  

what did the cigarette company do when studies came out that it wasn't healthy to smoke?

2018-10-07 13:39:04 UTC  

Same thing the oil companies are doing about climate change

2018-10-07 13:39:11 UTC  

<:smart:484956754489376781>

2018-10-07 13:40:00 UTC  

In 1951, the researchers wrote to 59,600 doctors and asked about their smoking habits. They kept a watch on the doctors' health and published the results in 1954 in a paper now deemed so important that the British Medical Journal reprinted the first page last June, 50 years after the original report.

2018-10-07 13:40:34 UTC  

so lets see, they figured this out in the 1970's but yet people were still smoking

2018-10-07 13:41:02 UTC  

wow, seems like once a company makes a lot of money selling something, they work to protect that cash cow and stiffle facts that say its unhealthy