I don't really have time to deal with triggered and bias people anymore, I will get you unbanned in public servers if you can get along with people.

It is relevant because you trust in computer models made by other people. It is a perception test.

Do you think it’s weird how the computer simulations match perfectly with actual lab tests?

I think it is weird that computer models suggest that building 7 and the twin towers fell due to 2 planes crashing into 2 buildings.

Do you think it's weird that you ditched the aether and are dogmatic about relativity, and rely on things you've seen on a screen as evidence? Enjoy your time man.

Why are you dodging the question Puppy?

I think its weird that @xXPuppyLoverXx s profile pic is a cat

same

Reminds me of white rabbit with the black rabbit.

I dodged the question because it’s completely irrelevant

perhaps the multiple "@ everyones" about it though, were a lil Spammy..
just sayn doe...

You don’t present the computer model itself as evidence, you use it to make predictions that we test in a lab

Its relevant, because you trust in computer models made by other people.

You can make a computer model say anything.

Then why do they match the results of the tests so well?

Why do the NIST models match the mainstream narrative so well?

1. Irrelevant
2. Maybe the mainstream narrative is right?

You think 2 planes can knockdown 3 steel framed buildings?

...

Can we please get back to the original topic

What if, and it's a big if,
Right
What if, listen right,
What if, the models fit,
Right, because the mainstream narrative is true

I’m not an expert on 9/11 theories

You are bringing up computer models, it is the only reason why I ask.

I’m slightly more of an expert on physics and mechanics

Ok what if the cube will hit pleasant park

I think that makes the NIST computer models regarding 9/11 relevant.

Or loot lake

They are completely different types of model

@atomix187 it's obviously going to the middle of the map

True

And for the 8 millionth time, I refer to the models because they make accurate predictions of reality

You're too far gone in your indoctrination. Have you ever done a laser test accounting for refraction before Puppy?

Tho ppl are saying tilted

But look how that ended the last 2 times

I disagree, they both used physics and mechanics to justify their results, but I understand if you don't want to talk about it.

People thought the meteor would hit tilted too

It’s a lot more complicated than that and you know it

You mean the cube @xXPuppyLoverXx ?

Why do these models that can be made to say anything accurately predict reality?

Oh not Fortnite then

@6429🦉 I don’t live near any lakes, so no