Message from @Satan

Discord ID: 488220637119250440


2018-09-09 05:26:35 UTC  

Fair call

2018-09-09 05:26:41 UTC  

Mhm

2018-09-09 05:27:02 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/488218758578569230/FB_IMG_1528658680539.jpg

2018-09-09 05:27:03 UTC  

The opposite call can be made to do the same as proof against God.

2018-09-09 05:27:19 UTC  

The breakdown is that the initial assertion determines the final assumption

2018-09-09 05:27:33 UTC  

You assert what you want in order to support your belief.

2018-09-09 05:27:47 UTC  

I can’t even deny that in my own case.

2018-09-09 05:27:57 UTC  

👋🏼 Gnite

2018-09-09 05:27:58 UTC  

But it seems easier to disprove than prove.

2018-09-09 05:28:06 UTC  

So I opt to disprove.

2018-09-09 05:28:16 UTC  

Night @Louis take care

2018-09-09 05:28:58 UTC  

Night louis

2018-09-09 05:29:48 UTC  

I can't prove that god doesn't exist so I take the agnostic position
I don't know if it does or doesn't

2018-09-09 05:30:53 UTC  

Might get hate for this one but i think it's more of a possibility for the concept of god to be man-made than god existing but ofc that's just a thought and I can't prove it

2018-09-09 05:31:21 UTC  

I can’t disprove God and can not explain why there is any cohesion in the universe. I choose to explain the laws that define the universe by saying that they are the result of God. Yet I can’t assert I would know what God is.

2018-09-09 05:32:06 UTC  

If something doesn't have the characteristics a "god" should then why call it god

2018-09-09 05:32:47 UTC  

The power to define how a universe works seems rather god like to me.

2018-09-09 05:33:30 UTC  

The issue is that people then assert God is a personal intelligence that influenced how the universe came to be.

2018-09-09 05:34:11 UTC  

Well isn't that literally the definition of god

2018-09-09 05:34:19 UTC  

I'd agree, however it seems to contradict all biblical knowledge

2018-09-09 05:34:30 UTC  

Not only biblical

2018-09-09 05:34:30 UTC  

You prove my point

2018-09-09 05:34:41 UTC  

Pretty much anything we know about god

2018-09-09 05:34:55 UTC  

You reject traditional knowledge of God and yet use him as a substitute for things we don't yet understand

2018-09-09 05:34:55 UTC  

Religion and God have been convoluted into being something that is the same, yet the concepts are distinct.

2018-09-09 05:35:00 UTC  

It contradicts the definition of god

2018-09-09 05:35:25 UTC  

It contradicts a definition of god

2018-09-09 05:35:30 UTC  

Likely many definitions

2018-09-09 05:36:16 UTC  

The question is, why is it that what we know works?

2018-09-09 05:36:47 UTC  

Not, “we don’t know how it works, so it’s God?”

2018-09-09 05:36:53 UTC  

String theroy innit

2018-09-09 05:37:09 UTC  

fuck string theory

2018-09-09 05:37:18 UTC  

If you want to get very deep into it, that would be one way to go into it.

2018-09-09 05:37:27 UTC  

Pepper 😠

2018-09-09 05:37:31 UTC  

String theory has no proof, though, ironically

2018-09-09 05:37:44 UTC  

string theory has no proof and no way of prooving it

2018-09-09 05:37:49 UTC  

It explains things, but as an explanation, it has not been observed

2018-09-09 05:37:54 UTC  

Neither does God (edgy take)

2018-09-09 05:38:00 UTC  

ooof

2018-09-09 05:38:10 UTC  

but yeah, no one uses string theory

2018-09-09 05:38:27 UTC  

Of course God cannot be proved, lol