Message from @Ætos
Discord ID: 488217698065580033
#SimpleRick
@Ætos wouldn't that make the bible junk?
Maybe
I see
Can’t exactly prove the Bible
Not going to pretend to be able to either
So your definition of god is different than the actual definition of god
So what do you reckon happens when you die?
@Providence so you're a Jehovah's Witness.
No idea
Oh shit
More likely than not, I’ll just cease to exist
Not super difficult to imagine
Thats a reasonable position, ætos
It’s a different concept to assert that God is personal than to assert that God exists.
So effectively you have an agnosticish attitude, who attributes forces we don't understand to an impersonal and uncaring force called God?
I don't call the laws god I have the position of agnostic but am an atheist cause I don't believe in God
Not exactly. The gaps argument of “what I cannot explain must be caused by God” isn’t particularly of use.
🤔 pantheist, ætos?
I forgot
I would assert in the place of the gaps argument that what I **can** understand exists because of God.
Panentheist specifically
Ahh
Which upon a google search is apparently different
😕
Lel
I can remember you found a term for your position but can't remember the term
Panentheist Process theologist
I have a name for it
*wrong*
Jk
God exists. What exists *can* exist because of God but does not exist because God influences it.
It might be, Nat.
I just don’t think it is.
Not super complicated
🤔 so you assert that God exists ?
I assert that God does not exist. I cannot prove otherwise. Therefore I assume then that God exists.
Fair call
Mhm
The opposite call can be made to do the same as proof against God.