Message from @Ætos

Discord ID: 488217698065580033


2018-09-09 05:18:59 UTC  

#SimpleRick

2018-09-09 05:19:10 UTC  

@Ætos wouldn't that make the bible junk?

2018-09-09 05:19:18 UTC  

Maybe

2018-09-09 05:19:21 UTC  

I see

2018-09-09 05:19:25 UTC  

Can’t exactly prove the Bible

2018-09-09 05:19:38 UTC  

Not going to pretend to be able to either

2018-09-09 05:19:45 UTC  

So your definition of god is different than the actual definition of god

2018-09-09 05:19:53 UTC  

So what do you reckon happens when you die?

2018-09-09 05:19:57 UTC  

@Providence so you're a Jehovah's Witness.

2018-09-09 05:20:01 UTC  

No idea

2018-09-09 05:20:06 UTC  

Oh shit

2018-09-09 05:20:12 UTC  

More likely than not, I’ll just cease to exist

2018-09-09 05:20:21 UTC  

Not super difficult to imagine

2018-09-09 05:20:24 UTC  

Thats a reasonable position, ætos

2018-09-09 05:21:07 UTC  

It’s a different concept to assert that God is personal than to assert that God exists.

2018-09-09 05:21:30 UTC  

So effectively you have an agnosticish attitude, who attributes forces we don't understand to an impersonal and uncaring force called God?

2018-09-09 05:22:01 UTC  

I don't call the laws god I have the position of agnostic but am an atheist cause I don't believe in God

2018-09-09 05:22:15 UTC  

Not exactly. The gaps argument of “what I cannot explain must be caused by God” isn’t particularly of use.

2018-09-09 05:22:32 UTC  

🤔 pantheist, ætos?

2018-09-09 05:22:35 UTC  

I forgot

2018-09-09 05:22:49 UTC  

I would assert in the place of the gaps argument that what I **can** understand exists because of God.

2018-09-09 05:23:01 UTC  

Panentheist specifically

2018-09-09 05:23:08 UTC  

Ahh

2018-09-09 05:23:16 UTC  

Which upon a google search is apparently different

2018-09-09 05:23:21 UTC  

😕

2018-09-09 05:23:25 UTC  

Lel

2018-09-09 05:23:39 UTC  

I can remember you found a term for your position but can't remember the term

2018-09-09 05:24:07 UTC  

Panentheist Process theologist

2018-09-09 05:24:32 UTC  

I have a name for it


*wrong*

2018-09-09 05:24:48 UTC  

Jk

2018-09-09 05:24:51 UTC  

God exists. What exists *can* exist because of God but does not exist because God influences it.

2018-09-09 05:24:59 UTC  

It might be, Nat.

2018-09-09 05:25:09 UTC  

I just don’t think it is.

2018-09-09 05:25:11 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/488218291282903050/40554768_325980184818306_6884027917660061696_n.jpg

2018-09-09 05:25:17 UTC  

Not super complicated

2018-09-09 05:25:44 UTC  

🤔 so you assert that God exists ?

2018-09-09 05:26:18 UTC  

I assert that God does not exist. I cannot prove otherwise. Therefore I assume then that God exists.

2018-09-09 05:26:35 UTC  

Fair call

2018-09-09 05:26:41 UTC  

Mhm

2018-09-09 05:27:02 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/488218758578569230/FB_IMG_1528658680539.jpg

2018-09-09 05:27:03 UTC  

The opposite call can be made to do the same as proof against God.