Message from @Christmas EveryDay

Discord ID: 488583432574599168


2018-09-10 05:18:54 UTC  

🖼

2018-09-10 05:18:55 UTC  

42 isnt a word

2018-09-10 05:18:56 UTC  

Yay!

2018-09-10 05:19:00 UTC  

Yay

2018-09-10 05:19:12 UTC  

Fourty-two @DrPeper

2018-09-10 05:19:28 UTC  

That isn't a sentance satan. Stop being silly

2018-09-10 05:19:37 UTC  

Shush

2018-09-10 05:22:17 UTC  

@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS I’m hoping you’re coming up with your answers. I really do want to see them.

2018-09-10 05:23:23 UTC  

@The Gwench

1. Curvature is hard to observe with the naked eye, and pictures are hotly debated.

2. Composite images of the earth are used rather than real satellite images, I'd like to see them before the touch up.

3. Science right now is very insular and more effort needs to be made to explain complex topics. It's also got the image problem of being an ivory tower. More effort needs to be made to reduce this and create transparency.

2018-09-10 05:27:34 UTC  

@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS Your 2nd answer is the only acceptable one.

The 1st one is true for both models. The 3rd says nothing of particular import with regards to the shape of the earth. Please provide 2 more. 👍

2018-09-10 05:28:02 UTC  

bendy water =]

2018-09-10 05:28:23 UTC  

Floaty land

2018-09-10 05:28:27 UTC  

oooof

2018-09-10 05:28:47 UTC  

land floats, lots of times =]

2018-09-10 05:29:27 UTC  

Show me the curvature of the floaty land

2018-09-10 05:30:08 UTC  

Custard curves

2018-09-10 05:30:10 UTC  

Surely my proofs would only apply to my own interpretation? Because isn't FE an incomplete model that not even FEers can agree on @The Gwench I think that you disagreeing with my legitimate reasons that you've convinced me of is odd

2018-09-10 05:31:55 UTC  

If #3 does apply to the shape of the Earth, because it directly relates to the credibility of the theory

2018-09-10 05:32:35 UTC  

@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS The undecided role is of significant importance. While I appreciate that your views are valuable to yourself, it is your responsibility to convince me.

2018-09-10 05:35:06 UTC  

With all due respect, having a gatekeeper on FE belief seems to go against the attidue that it's open to everyone who believes. At that point it has many of the flaws we criticise the mainstream for. I don't think you'd be this harsh on me if I was new here.

2018-09-10 05:36:07 UTC  

we can't reach outer space, that factors in somewhere...

2018-09-10 05:36:18 UTC  

Can’t we?

2018-09-10 05:36:39 UTC  

nope

2018-09-10 05:36:53 UTC  

News to me 🤔

2018-09-10 05:37:03 UTC  

@xXPuppyLoverXx !! Did you survive the ashes

2018-09-10 05:37:05 UTC  

=]

2018-09-10 05:37:32 UTC  

I did

2018-09-10 05:37:37 UTC  

Some went in my drink though

2018-09-10 05:38:23 UTC  

@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS This isn’t harsh. All of us want to hear your questions about the globe. Now let’s get back to the task at hand. Please don’t shift the discussion. Continue.

2018-09-10 05:38:30 UTC  
2018-09-10 05:38:44 UTC  
2018-09-10 05:49:21 UTC  

@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS Please share with us how you specifically question the globe model. Everyone here is dying to hear it.

2018-09-10 05:50:30 UTC  

Wait I thought the discussion moved on. I stand by my 3 proofs even if you reject them.

2018-09-10 05:52:11 UTC  

*rejected*

2018-09-10 05:52:14 UTC  

@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS Give up so easily? Tbh I was being generous. The proof about the fake images is true, but they really fall more under the NASA conspiracy and not the shape of the earth.

2018-09-10 05:52:15 UTC  

😂

2018-09-10 05:53:24 UTC  

Even if they don’t come from nasa? 🤔

2018-09-10 05:56:11 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/488588483368189962/Horsehead-No-lettering-1280x441-3-2.jpg

2018-09-10 05:56:16 UTC  

😂

2018-09-10 05:56:46 UTC  

Goes back to what I said a couple days back, it’s really weird how everyone hates on nasa but ESA and roscosmos and JAXA and all the other space agencies get a free pass