Message from @Satan

Discord ID: 488674535118340107


2018-09-10 11:34:52 UTC  

She's also more invested as she has had her Twitter gotten by the big mass ban

2018-09-10 11:34:58 UTC  

Yeah puppy but I think that's what we were talking about
Shadow banning people would be censorship but it's also Facebook's right to be snowflakes

2018-09-10 11:35:25 UTC  

Loaded terms <:angery:486195953410244608>

2018-09-10 11:35:52 UTC  

4chan is d best

2018-09-10 11:35:54 UTC  

No rules

2018-09-10 11:36:17 UTC  

4chan is not good

2018-09-10 11:36:24 UTC  

It has everything

2018-09-10 11:36:31 UTC  

But I like places that don't have rules

2018-09-10 11:36:36 UTC  

Especially on internet

2018-09-10 11:36:46 UTC  

Reddit has everything but you don't have to put up with anything you don't want

2018-09-10 11:36:54 UTC  

Eh

2018-09-10 11:37:06 UTC  

Reddish quarantines subreddits

2018-09-10 11:37:10 UTC  

Reddit*

2018-09-10 11:37:26 UTC  

Yeah fair call for them

2018-09-10 11:37:29 UTC  

Only the illegal ones usually

2018-09-10 11:37:31 UTC  

Just the most toxic ones

2018-09-10 11:37:38 UTC  

I would have no problem with censorship if their intentions were to prevent harm to others or to the fate of our political process. However, how could that possibly be policed?

2018-09-10 11:37:43 UTC  

Or if they’re getting a bit extreme and taking over like the_donald did

2018-09-10 11:37:48 UTC  

As much as I hate incels they weren't illegal

2018-09-10 11:38:00 UTC  

They had incredibly violent rhetoric

2018-09-10 11:38:08 UTC  

Not illegal

2018-09-10 11:38:12 UTC  

They are dicks

2018-09-10 11:38:23 UTC  

And they weren't doing anything illegal

2018-09-10 11:38:45 UTC  

Calling for death to all women is borderline crime

2018-09-10 11:38:56 UTC  

Is it?

2018-09-10 11:39:07 UTC  

@Satan It May be illegal if it’s considered to be slander.

2018-09-10 11:39:08 UTC  

Even if it's hilariously unachievable

2018-09-10 11:39:21 UTC  

I don't know if it's crime

2018-09-10 11:39:38 UTC  

@Satan Inciting violence is a crime.

2018-09-10 11:40:00 UTC  

O

2018-09-10 11:40:02 UTC  

Sucks

2018-09-10 11:40:20 UTC  

@The Gwench removing the fake news is to help the political process though, their main intent is to recover from the Cambridge anylictia issue

2018-09-10 11:40:52 UTC  

Apologies for spelling

2018-09-10 11:40:56 UTC  

It's late

2018-09-10 11:41:21 UTC  

If they find a way to not fuck up their algorithm and not remove satire and specifically target fake news then it'd be good but we all know that won't happen since Facebook sucks cock

2018-09-10 11:41:36 UTC  

That's what they are aiming for

2018-09-10 11:41:38 UTC  

@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS How would we ever know if their intentions are true, or if to push their own personal agenda.

2018-09-10 11:41:56 UTC  

If they developed an algorithm that complex they could basically just make licensing that algorithm out their entire business model

2018-09-10 11:41:56 UTC  

Won't happen :^)

2018-09-10 11:43:37 UTC  

Say one party was making hundreds of thousands of misleading posts with the intent to split people apart if you stopped them posting would that be okay? @The Gwench

2018-09-10 11:44:13 UTC  

Hey guys. I’m tired now and going back to bed. Thanks for the great discussion @Satan @xXPuppyLoverXx @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS . 😃