Message from @xXPuppyLoverXx
Discord ID: 488674431359778837
True
I do want Gwenchs take on this as she seemed to have a different opinion
In practice, it’s used to describe the extreme end more than the tiny little things like banning you from a website
She's also more invested as she has had her Twitter gotten by the big mass ban
Yeah puppy but I think that's what we were talking about
Shadow banning people would be censorship but it's also Facebook's right to be snowflakes
Loaded terms <:angery:486195953410244608>
4chan is d best
No rules
4chan is not good
It has everything
But I like places that don't have rules
Especially on internet
Reddit has everything but you don't have to put up with anything you don't want
Eh
Reddish quarantines subreddits
Reddit*
Yeah fair call for them
Only the illegal ones usually
Just the most toxic ones
I would have no problem with censorship if their intentions were to prevent harm to others or to the fate of our political process. However, how could that possibly be policed?
As much as I hate incels they weren't illegal
They had incredibly violent rhetoric
Not illegal
They are dicks
And they weren't doing anything illegal
Calling for death to all women is borderline crime
Is it?
@Satan It May be illegal if it’s considered to be slander.
Even if it's hilariously unachievable
I don't know if it's crime
@Satan Inciting violence is a crime.
O
Sucks
@The Gwench removing the fake news is to help the political process though, their main intent is to recover from the Cambridge anylictia issue
Apologies for spelling
It's late
If they find a way to not fuck up their algorithm and not remove satire and specifically target fake news then it'd be good but we all know that won't happen since Facebook sucks cock
That's what they are aiming for
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS How would we ever know if their intentions are true, or if to push their own personal agenda.
If they developed an algorithm that complex they could basically just make licensing that algorithm out their entire business model