Message from @The18thDoctor
Discord ID: 498175986248974337
for military reasons they don't want unlimited energy
they want limited fuel so its easier to track
government
Which one?
And unlimited energy is impossible because of the laws of thermodynamics.
mostly US based but possibly greater than them
if you can tap into water as an energy source to fuel cars with, for all pratical purposes you just created unlimited energy
they will come after you for that if you start implementing it
maybe that is another reason they are putting chemical waste in the water
Well hydrogen fuel cells do exist, however they are expensive to manufacture, so they aren’t common. Race cars use fuel cells, I think. Good old gasoline-powered internal combustion engines are cheaper and much more reliable.
flouride
What about it?
In small quantities it’s good for your teeth.
What’s that?
with the right tech you could theorhetically take water and use it as gasoline
The science says fluoride’s good for your teeth. Do you brush your teeth? There’s fluoride in your toothpaste, in case you didn’t know. I’ve used fluoride in toothpaste all my life and never experienced any harmful effects.
the primary reason we aren't doing that, and I'm certain we already have the tech, is because it would be a military nightmare
you could move stuff around too freely
So ^Kevin^
I was wondering if you wanted to answer that epistemology question of mine: what do you believe truth to be?
truth is not relative, truth is facts that aren't debatable
you can debate with someone about facts and truth, but even if you both conclude wrongly that the truth isn't the truth, it doesn't change the truth
you can both conclude that the sky is clearly pink or orange, even though its blue
but when you live within a reality enwhich matter is a product of quatnum manifestation "fact" is linear in a non-linear reality as the mandella effect has proven
in short "you" could see a pink sky and the world wold see you as bloody crazy; but in your reality it would be a pink sky
mandella effect has not been proven
just because it's not been proven to yourself doesn't mean it's not been proven....
So you believe in correspondence theory? That which is true is that which is actual in the material universe.
if I haven't bought into the theory, its just a theory, not a fact
What's a fact?
a fact is something I have bought into
its completely subject to my beliefs
(this is a joke)
Some epistemologists do buy into relativism
didn't I already say truth isn't relative
its not subject to someone's beliefs
Interesting