I know how 3D modeling works and I bought space engineers when it was being made

they tried to make planets and it was sad and pathetic in their early attempts

too round

Human Sheeple quit gish galloping

they were trying to put us on a ball

<:megalul:485077677175472148>

Sad!

too much of a ball, that isn't reality

You can go outside and try and see the curve with unbiased on for once Shady

You won't find what you are looking for

They have simulations of globes that work far better than a flat one. I could create one in a unity engine

<:globiegoggles:485140915149864980>

3D engines don't represent reality because over long distances light bends an enormous amount

Too much of a ball, that isn't GOD

oh look

light doesn't bend an enormous amount

horizon doesnt rise to eye level

@Hugh Ignore the lift bending the wing up ha ha

human eyes are circular in nature and most people have two of them

Hugh, that's just an optical illusion created by fish eye lenses c'mon

We all know that!

@Human Sheeple the wing is not the focus point

so we see with two eyes to gain perspective, which also has its own peculiarities

the line is

But uh @Human Sheeple The wing isn't tilted up, look at the indicator on the top

That's the point.

So air doesn't push the wings up, lifting the plane up bending the wing upwards from the stress strain forces? Oh no that would be crazy

you see the white and the green lines, sheep?

https://youtu.be/eNRry_nFAgo

Tell me, can the flat earth model accurately predict the next solar eclipse?

imma watching this fresh video atm

why are you on about the wings, we arent using them

They don't believe in Eclipses, Shady

No they do

@ShadyMasterJ Saros Cycle yes, can the globe model predict accuratley solar eclipses?

really?

<:thonk:485324336874651650>

Nah nah, kevin earlier claimed that the Moon has it's own source of light, its' own glow.

Says who Tooth

Kevin

Because it does