they are when they trying to fake the sun

<:GWqlabsHyperSweats:398950682834763788>

so flat earthers have started filming horizon in infrared

can see 475 miles away?

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwuxNdg8dTE> for reference this is the video of globe busters with this pic in it

Flat Earth - I Can See for Miles and Miles...

**Apollo 11** A comprehensive set of camera equipment was carried on board Apollo 11. **This included two 16mm Maurer motion picture film cameras, a color television camera in the orbiting Columbia**, and a *black and white TV camera outside of the lunar module to transmit to Earth Neil Armstrong's first steps on the Moon's surface.* A Kodak stereo close-up camera was used to film the lunar soil from only inches away. Three Hasselblad 500EL cameras were carried.

ok, how about the transmission equipment

Looks like Mars - do like NASA and "add" red tint to "view what it looks like"

cause if i remember correctly the way they had to trasmite the data was in a weird frequency

its all lies

NASA lies

Those cameras that they used, including the dual 16mm Maurer motion picture film cameras were already huge by themselves, and they don't look that bigger compared to the other ones that they carried. As far as the transmission equipment goes, the whole supposed conversation from the Moon into the Oval office is not only virtually impossible at the time, but it's still impossible now. You can't even get some signal in some areas of the earth, let alone try doing it from the Moon.

constantly

and consistantly

wasnt it sent to australia first then the signal was played on a screen, then that was filmed on regualr TV frequency and that broadcast

that is why the picture looks weird for the landing

I like how Nixon has a normal convo with these astronauts when they are on the moon and now they are under a 10 sec delay to the ISS

someone tell NASA that the moon is further than 250 miles of ISS

Data Storage Equipment (DSE). To make the supposed recordings possible, they claim that they used something called a Data Storage Electronics Assembly, which even if you look into the official explanation, they're trying to explain it away how it should've been virtually impossible, but due to certain atmosphrenic circumstances, it was able to and I quote; *As a result, many of its recordings are barely, if at all, audible, with a constant high-pitched background tone. In the attached database, the recordings that are virtually inaudible are highlighted*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG6yTft6Cfw

Nope, they didn't go to the moon, its pretty obvious

I mean it's impossible with all the technology and improvements we have made so far upto late 2018 into transmitters, strenghtening the signals in-between access points, etc...so to think that, they easily pulled something like that back in the late 60s/early 70s, it just doesn't add up.

👏

NASA LIES +1

And to make my self clear, this has nothing to do with the shape of the earth argument, which is what most people turn it into. People are still free to to think that they have scientific resources to back up the sphericity of the Earth, like that is not the point when it comes to the moon landings.

Van allen radiation belt we cannot get past, lost telemetry data on man's greatest accomplishment....

People are entitled to think as they wish, it's none of my business.

well, there is a reason why we cannot get to the moon

Fimament blocks us from getting out of enclosed system

o yeah, i agree, nothing to do with the shape of the earth

We have a ceiling

~~also if you dont think what i think you are wrong and stupid~~

I never said that

At the end of the day, we are born here and we die here...most of us won't go beyond 35k feet of altitude.

<:thonk:485324336874651650>

just buy an SR-71

simple

Better to know the truth dying then die blind

I think one of the strongest elements that we have is the fact that globes were put into brainwash centers/schools to indoctrinate young minds who believe in santa clause to also believe in the fake globe