Message from @BurritoPlanet

Discord ID: 513361596580495380


2018-11-17 13:44:19 UTC  

I'm not

2018-11-17 13:45:06 UTC  

A selenilion is also called a horizontal eclipse

2018-11-17 13:45:38 UTC  

Don't forget that atmospheric refraction is the only reason why it's possible to observe

2018-11-17 13:46:03 UTC  

Yes meaning the shadow is moving perpendicular to the movement of a normal eclipse.

2018-11-17 13:46:43 UTC  

Ok

2018-11-17 13:50:21 UTC  

Maybe you're right, I mean if you think electromagnetic energy has anything to do with tides then yes I'm completely wrong and I accept your theory

2018-11-17 13:51:06 UTC  

I’m going back to bed. I’ll give you time to come up with an explanation for your globe model.

My question is:
Why does the shadow travel downwards over the moon, when logically, the shadow should travel upwards over the moon?

2018-11-17 13:58:55 UTC  

I won't explain anything

2018-11-17 13:58:57 UTC  

Because

2018-11-17 13:59:09 UTC  

You're doing this

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/513352400627564568/IMG_20181117_155459.jpg

2018-11-17 13:59:53 UTC  

Goodnight btw

2018-11-17 14:00:13 UTC  

I understand. You won’t explain because you can’t. Got it. 👍🏼

2018-11-17 14:00:37 UTC  

I can

2018-11-17 14:00:44 UTC  

But I won't explain to you

2018-11-17 14:02:21 UTC  

@Samwise Sure Sam. That’s it. Won’t explain to me. Everyone here sees that you don’t effing know. 😉

2018-11-17 14:02:39 UTC  

Okay thanks

2018-11-17 14:03:20 UTC  

😃

2018-11-17 14:08:12 UTC  

You know what is funny, is that if said those things you said to me to you, you would have banned me, just keep in mind that when I talk here I have to withhold myself and tread carefully around you. Because well, lots of people know why

2018-11-17 14:35:24 UTC  

i think if you want to figure it out, the easiest way would be to construct a 3d model of the 3 bodies

2018-11-17 14:35:31 UTC  

See what actually happens

2018-11-17 14:35:42 UTC  

why do i have globe role?

2018-11-17 14:38:41 UTC  

Are you a flat earther?

2018-11-17 14:39:39 UTC  

i am undecided

2018-11-17 14:40:01 UTC  

No true flat earther can be undecided, therefore you’re a glober

2018-11-17 14:40:12 UTC  

not really

2018-11-17 14:40:25 UTC  

I can see how we've all been lied to but i'm not sure about the flat earth version either

2018-11-17 14:41:26 UTC  

How have we all been lied to?

2018-11-17 14:41:30 UTC  

What’s to gain

2018-11-17 14:42:28 UTC  

to hide the truth about the Lord and his creation

2018-11-17 14:42:48 UTC  

How does saying the earth is round accomplish this?

2018-11-17 14:43:08 UTC  

Wouldn’t burning bibles and destroying manuscripts work better?

2018-11-17 14:43:32 UTC  

Banning religion even

2018-11-17 14:43:48 UTC  

What’s the shape of the earth got to do with god?

2018-11-17 14:45:32 UTC  

I don't have time to go into it right now sorry

2018-11-17 14:45:40 UTC  

Okay

2018-11-17 14:52:36 UTC  

<@&484512215764828162> can you update my roles? idk why i have mainstream and globe

2018-11-17 15:18:51 UTC  

Are you sandwich earth now??

2018-11-17 15:20:09 UTC  

<@&508437171611631626>

2018-11-17 15:26:49 UTC  

Take a look at how tides actually work. These are also know as tidal nodes.
Is it possible things like magnetohydrodynamics plays a part? I think its an interesting concept.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphidromic_point

https://www.plasma-universe.com/Magnetohydrodynamics

https://youtu.be/swrK1qJHUYg

2018-11-17 15:29:53 UTC  

Leaving aside that these are from Satellite based technology from NASA, we will need to use this as an approximation.
This has a record of numerous amphidromic points, which are points of zero amplitude, and so show no tide. That would be the dark blue zones where the lines meet. The arrows around them show their rotation.
It becomes quickly apparent that there is no static tides over the oceans as predicted by Newtonian Mechanics, but rather there are rotations of bulges of water points, while large tides are located in random places out away from the zero amplitude tides.
With the normal unit vector n for the water molecules pointing towards the moon which attracts the waters, there is expected to be a uniform concentration of the bulge of water as predicted by Newtonian Mechanics. But as we can see, there is not.
One point brought up with the equilibrium theory of tides is that the Earth rotates beneath the tidal bulge from the moon and the coriolis effect deflects the path of the water and it forms a rotation over a point where the high tides are all away from.
However, it is quite clear from the data that this is not the case, as the rotation doesn't match the coriolis rotation of the specific hemispheres, and there are amphidromic points at the equator as well. When the Coriolis effect at the equator with F=2VΩsin A and the equator being at sinA=sin0°=0, means that there is F = 0, no coriolis force in the standard model at the equator while amphidromic points are located there. So, this clearly points to a failed attempt by the equilibrium theory.
There simply is no success in the Newtonian Gravity model of tides, it fails to match reality.
Therefore, the tides make a paradox with the contemporary model of the Earth. @Mr Orb ☭

2018-11-17 15:39:32 UTC  

phosphorescence in celestite 254 nm (sw) https://www.fluomin.org/imagefluo/CELESTITEoc.jpg