Message from @BurritoPlanet
Discord ID: 513365849676054528
Okay thanks
😃
You know what is funny, is that if said those things you said to me to you, you would have banned me, just keep in mind that when I talk here I have to withhold myself and tread carefully around you. Because well, lots of people know why
i think if you want to figure it out, the easiest way would be to construct a 3d model of the 3 bodies
See what actually happens
why do i have globe role?
Are you a flat earther?
i am undecided
No true flat earther can be undecided, therefore you’re a glober
not really
I can see how we've all been lied to but i'm not sure about the flat earth version either
How have we all been lied to?
What’s to gain
to hide the truth about the Lord and his creation
How does saying the earth is round accomplish this?
Wouldn’t burning bibles and destroying manuscripts work better?
Banning religion even
What’s the shape of the earth got to do with god?
I don't have time to go into it right now sorry
Okay
Are you sandwich earth now??
<@&508437171611631626>
Take a look at how tides actually work. These are also know as tidal nodes.
Is it possible things like magnetohydrodynamics plays a part? I think its an interesting concept.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphidromic_point
https://www.plasma-universe.com/Magnetohydrodynamics
https://youtu.be/swrK1qJHUYg
Leaving aside that these are from Satellite based technology from NASA, we will need to use this as an approximation.
This has a record of numerous amphidromic points, which are points of zero amplitude, and so show no tide. That would be the dark blue zones where the lines meet. The arrows around them show their rotation.
It becomes quickly apparent that there is no static tides over the oceans as predicted by Newtonian Mechanics, but rather there are rotations of bulges of water points, while large tides are located in random places out away from the zero amplitude tides.
With the normal unit vector n for the water molecules pointing towards the moon which attracts the waters, there is expected to be a uniform concentration of the bulge of water as predicted by Newtonian Mechanics. But as we can see, there is not.
One point brought up with the equilibrium theory of tides is that the Earth rotates beneath the tidal bulge from the moon and the coriolis effect deflects the path of the water and it forms a rotation over a point where the high tides are all away from.
However, it is quite clear from the data that this is not the case, as the rotation doesn't match the coriolis rotation of the specific hemispheres, and there are amphidromic points at the equator as well. When the Coriolis effect at the equator with F=2VΩsin A and the equator being at sinA=sin0°=0, means that there is F = 0, no coriolis force in the standard model at the equator while amphidromic points are located there. So, this clearly points to a failed attempt by the equilibrium theory.
There simply is no success in the Newtonian Gravity model of tides, it fails to match reality.
Therefore, the tides make a paradox with the contemporary model of the Earth. @Mr Orb â˜
phosphorescence in celestite 254 nm (sw) https://www.fluomin.org/imagefluo/CELESTITEoc.jpg
The moon is lit due to reflection
If it was due to phosphorescence then there wouldn’t be phases
It would be a full moon all the time
Flat floor craters are not possible to be created by impacts
Everyone knows the contemporary model
We dont need to rehash it every second
If you dont have any alternative thought or info. Dont bother posting here
Posting information about teslas fluorescence or pictures of phosphorescense in celestite is only to explore the ideas. No one is claiming its 100 percent the reason the moon lights the way it does.
Have some imagination and creativity apart from just repeating everything you have been force fed in government propaganda centers