Message from @Death Strike's Bat
Discord ID: 273638021025366017
THAT'S HYSTERICAL
ESPECIALLY THE IMAGE
LOOKS LIKE A COMMODORE PET OR ONE OF THE TERMINALS IT WAS BASED UPON
I BET THEY HAVE 3 ACRE STORAGE SITES FULL OF OLD HARD DRIVES
did you see trump's paki pick to head the FCC?
corporate stooge
like tom wheeler
yoour article is bringing out the jew hate brett https://www.reddit.com/r/DarkEnlightenment/comments/5pyw4e/leftists_accuse_you_of_their_own_dysfunction/
I LOVE CORPORATE STOOGES
WAIT
WHAT
PAKSASTIN TAEKS OVER TEH UNTIED STAETS?
SOMEONE GET @Jossi A BEER
LOCK 'N' LOAD
IT IS TIME TO FUCK SOME SHIT UP
I'm a pacifist. I listen to too much taylor swift to be violent, but yes, I'll take a beer
taylor swift? need to listen to cro-mags
and drink 40s
yep I am having a beer in preperation
keeping it at an iron age level
Good morning, gentlemen.
That poses a special danger to a country that cherishes First Amendment speech, freedom of expression, even freedom of association. I think it's dangerous, frankly, that we don't see more often people espousing the First Amendment view that we should have a robust marketplace of ideas where everybody should be willing and able to participate.
Largely what we're seeing, especially on college campuses, is that if my view is in the majority and I don't agree with your view, then I have the right to shout you down, disrupt your events, or otherwise suppress your ability to get your voice heard.
That's something, I think, that poses a danger to what I call the culture of the First Amendment. The text of the First Amendment is enshrined in our Constitution, but there are certain cultural values that undergird the amendment that are critical for its protections to have actual meaning. If that culture starts to wither away, then so too will the freedom that it supports.
Examiner: Do you believe that those who oppose the culture of the First Amendment are at war against conservative points of view, including censorship on Twitter?
Pai: What I can say is that I would hope whoever the president is, Americans would return to the tradition that we've had of respectful and robust public debate. That's something increasingly becoming rare. I think it's critical that the American public be in the driver's seat when it comes to this issue. No one should have a monopoly on the ability to get a point across.
this guy is great
Nice but he favors allowing corporate censorship
I'll put something up about that hypocrisy today
@Death Strike's Bat Nice.
FWIW I'm torn on public censorship - on one I think firms should be able to discriminate but on the other I don't see it's the State's position to dictate whether they do or not.
No gay cakes, whites only, etc should all be ok - we can sort out the rightness or wrongness of that.. Uncle Scam doesn't need to get in the middle of that shit.
They're not a firm; they're a utility.
If a bakery was the only bakery for 100 miles
And chose not to sell to gays
That would be a problem
Just examples