THIS CAN TELL US SOME THINGS, ALTHOUGH NOT AS MUCH AS SOME WOULD SUGGEST

FOR EXAMPLE

CONSIDER THE SCANNING THAT THEY HAVE DONE TO VALIDATE TRUTHFUL RESPONSES

WHAT PARTS OF THE BRAIN ARE ENGAGED

TELL US WHAT TYPE OF STRATEGY IS BEING EMPLOYED

SIMILAR TO

This is not possible to do in any mass, reprodui

WATCHING THE EYES OF PEOPLE WHEN THEY TALK

SOME LIE

reproducible way

watching eyes and sgtuff

is differet

IF YOU HAVE A STUDY OR ANALYSIS, LINK ME TO IT

OTHERWISE, GOING TO GO WITH WHAT I SAW SOME YEARS BACK

okay, I'll look

THAT WAS HIGHLY CREDIBLE

the whole field is just crap

Fallot has studies on Myers Briggs

peer reviewed only fkr

He's a Scorpio

Watch out. Scorpios are feisty

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/03/mri_software_bugs_could_upend_years_of_research/

just first google response

actually, I just remembered

Bruce Charlton wrote on this too

http://iqpersonalitygenius.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/a-critique-of-functional-brain-imaging.html

There are more people in here now to sum up their personalities

There we go

"science"

"medicine"

"actual data"

"proof"

Hang on let me find the John Hopkins stuff

it's about trangenders more but it also has relevant information

he's going deep

about brain difference science

next he'll be pulling out the northwestern material

i'd actually like to read about it

i don't buy medical imaging successfully mapping one's predilictions

something about overlaying an image of an old telephone switchboard

as the human brain