Message from @Deleted User 57835c2c
Discord ID: 285181463781965824
WELFARE CREATES WEAKNESS, IN MY VIEW
CAPITALISM BY ITSELF IS FOOLISH
CAPITALISM GUIDED BY SOMETHING ELSE IS THE BEST OPTION
Welfare supports a certain kind of behavior or being
SOCIALISM CREATES DEPENDAS
if you support weakness, then you create it
THAT TOO
Hey @diversity_is_racism wanna hear a song I made for @Hagel ?
AND FOR THOSE WHO ARE INDUCED INTO IT
But you can support good tyhings that the free market will not support
IT CREATES EXISTENTIAL FUTILITY
welfare does not create weakness, look at great painters in history or great scientists pre revolution and you will find many of them were sponsored by nobles
@spaceplacenta I AM STILL LISTENING TO LAST ONE! BUT YES
That is what welfare is for, that is the value of socialis
I LIKE THE PRODUCTION TECHNIQUES AND DYNAMICS
I CAN SEE WHAT YOU MEAN ABOUT MELODIES
they were literal welfare queens being paid to exist
That's a good example, Exilarch. Fine art is not profitable
it needs welfare to exist
PULL AN EPIC MELODY AND SEMI-EPIC ONE OUT OF YOUR ASS, AND YOU WILL HAVE A GREAT TRACK
SPONSORSHIP BY NOBLES IS NOT WELFARE
IT IS GRANTS
GIVEN TO THOSE WHO DEMONSTRATE APTITUDE
OPPOSITE PRINCIPLE OF WELFARE
WHICH IS TO HAND PEOPLE MONEY FOR BEING HUMAN
most of ancient greece with all their philosophers were buff guys sitting around lifting weights and wondering about stuff
GRANTS = REWARD HIGH QUALITY; WELFARE = LOW QUALITY
hahahahaha
Classic Exilarch
ancient greece kicked ass and produced tons of geniuses because slaves did work while the white guys got buff and used their brains
THERE IS A LARGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GIVING GRANTS TO PHILOSOPHERS
AND PAYING PROLES TO PROLE
AND BECAUSE ALL THE GUYS WRITING WERE UPPER CASTE
MOST OF WHOM WERE WEALTHY ANYWAY
REMEMBER THAT SOCRATES ARGUED FOR MONEY AND PLATO WAS A UNIVERSITY TEACHER
SO THEY WERE EMPLOYED
DITTO ARISTOTLE
Sokrates was a bum though
My argument is simply this