Message from @sampletext
Discord ID: 292038871921721344
Yes, but it should be determined that the child was raped and that the person being killed is infact guilty
@Death Strike's Bat I would help you or hide you if you were on the run.
You want to excuse his actions? You die too.
I don't assume that someone who would wantonly commit murder is a good judge
I would actually assume they are an unstable person prone to violence
Ok, since it is getting this absurd, let's add a final condition: you WALK IN on the act of rape.
It's not absurd
I would kill him on the spot.
'wantonly'?
are you kidding?
It's not absurd to think that you should determine someone committed a crime before killing them
I would stab him repeatedly.
Nah
Which is the condition you're arguing against
you walk in on him
Don't spend money on it.
No appeals.
No mercy
Appeal is phonecall
Automatically denied.
the state-run justice system is just as prone to error as mine and @Death Strike's Bat 's, with the added drawback of delay and lack of justice.
Nah I disagree
There's accountability
Which is the difference
There is oversight
Vigilante justice has no oversight other than other vigilantes and the extant justice system
are you a troll? 😉
@sampletext That was sly AF
How is it vigilante?
haha ikr?
That would be the law.
It would make more sense to empoer the justice system
Maarat I'm not talking about your system
the guy got 5 years of probation too lol
Which essentially legalizes honour killings
Good sentence.
Love it.
Nah I would kill Muslims who kill their wives.
Or being Muslims.