But you do, so I approve of your principled non-hypocrisy.

If you rape a child

You should die

painfully

I would kill the lawyer and family

Being labelled a criminal is a far lesser stigma for me than being someone who would let his child be raped and not take vengeance.

Of anyone who defended the rapist of my kid.

Yes, but it should be determined that the child was raped and that the person being killed is infact guilty

@Death Strike's Bat I would help you or hide you if you were on the run.

You want to excuse his actions? You die too.

I don't assume that someone who would wantonly commit murder is a good judge

I would actually assume they are an unstable person prone to violence

Ok, since it is getting this absurd, let's add a final condition: you WALK IN on the act of rape.

It's not absurd

I would kill him on the spot.

'wantonly'?

are you kidding?

It's not absurd to think that you should determine someone committed a crime before killing them

I would stab him repeatedly.

Nah

Which is the condition you're arguing against

you walk in on him

Don't spend money on it.

No appeals.

No mercy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PUE8fYxjq8

Appeal is phonecall

shot that smug look off his face too

Automatically denied.

the state-run justice system is just as prone to error as mine and @Death Strike's Bat 's, with the added drawback of delay and lack of justice.

Nah I disagree

There's accountability

Which is the difference

There is oversight

Vigilante justice has no oversight other than other vigilantes and the extant justice system

are you a troll? 😉

@sampletext That was sly AF

How is it vigilante?

haha ikr?

That would be the law.

It would make more sense to empoer the justice system