Message from @Death Strike's Bat

Discord ID: 292038224136634369


2017-03-16 20:47:12 UTC  

@Jake Saga That is a better way to ask I imagine lol

2017-03-16 20:47:33 UTC  

our ancestors up through the 18th century or later were incredibly apt to take justice into their own hands.

2017-03-16 20:47:58 UTC  

Losing that trait is only good when you have a society we no longer have.

2017-03-16 20:49:35 UTC  

The State took the role of the patriarchy in that regard some time ago. So much so that now women take full advantage.

2017-03-16 20:50:10 UTC  

yes

2017-03-16 20:51:49 UTC  

That was, at one point, pretty much our responsibility. Now it's yet another function we've outsourced to the State.

2017-03-16 20:52:31 UTC  

It's sick. The care of the old, our young, our children, we've outsourced it all.

2017-03-16 20:52:46 UTC  

Indeed we have.

2017-03-16 20:53:18 UTC  

We need to form networks of likeminded people who can form a parallel society. Old style fraternal societies or something.

2017-03-16 20:53:27 UTC  

We outsourced justice to the cops

2017-03-16 20:53:42 UTC  

And got weak and helpless

2017-03-16 20:53:46 UTC  

Big surprise

2017-03-16 20:54:26 UTC  

Jake Saga - Today at 7:45 AM
What if the rapist raped your - toddler son, for example? Anally?

why would that change things? i'm not a hypocrite

2017-03-16 20:54:56 UTC  

it's not hypocrisy to change one's actions based on different data or input or situations.

2017-03-16 20:55:03 UTC  

no, it's the same situation

2017-03-16 20:55:12 UTC  

I would shove fiacraaxkers into his mouth.

2017-03-16 20:55:15 UTC  

I would not feel like a hypocrite for killing someone who raped my toddler.

2017-03-16 20:55:28 UTC  

Because I've never claimed to abide by the principle that the state has a monopoly on violence.

2017-03-16 20:55:34 UTC  

No, you would be a criminal, which is how the justice system works

2017-03-16 20:55:35 UTC  

I would sodomize him with a stick of dynamite.

2017-03-16 20:55:38 UTC  

Yes

2017-03-16 20:55:41 UTC  

Which is ridiculous

2017-03-16 20:55:43 UTC  

But you do, so I approve of your principled non-hypocrisy.

2017-03-16 20:55:46 UTC  

If you rape a child

2017-03-16 20:55:49 UTC  

You should die

2017-03-16 20:55:54 UTC  

painfully

2017-03-16 20:56:15 UTC  

I would kill the lawyer and family

2017-03-16 20:56:25 UTC  

Being labelled a criminal is a far lesser stigma for me than being someone who would let his child be raped and not take vengeance.

2017-03-16 20:56:26 UTC  

Of anyone who defended the rapist of my kid.

2017-03-16 20:56:39 UTC  

Yes, but it should be determined that the child was raped and that the person being killed is infact guilty

2017-03-16 20:56:43 UTC  

@Death Strike's Bat I would help you or hide you if you were on the run.

2017-03-16 20:56:46 UTC  

You want to excuse his actions? You die too.

2017-03-16 20:56:54 UTC  

I don't assume that someone who would wantonly commit murder is a good judge

2017-03-16 20:57:10 UTC  

I would actually assume they are an unstable person prone to violence

2017-03-16 20:57:13 UTC  

Ok, since it is getting this absurd, let's add a final condition: you WALK IN on the act of rape.

2017-03-16 20:57:22 UTC  

It's not absurd

2017-03-16 20:57:24 UTC  

I would kill him on the spot.

2017-03-16 20:57:31 UTC  

'wantonly'?

2017-03-16 20:57:35 UTC  

are you kidding?

2017-03-16 20:57:35 UTC  

It's not absurd to think that you should determine someone committed a crime before killing them

2017-03-16 20:57:38 UTC  

I would stab him repeatedly.