Message from @Salt

Discord ID: 297840477888053249


2017-04-01 21:03:18 UTC  

Western Europe was eager to be Americanized

2017-04-01 21:03:25 UTC  

America was pedestalized in Europe since 19th century

2017-04-01 21:04:24 UTC  

Yes, Europe was like a suburban kid being desperate to be black, becoming a wigger

2017-04-01 21:04:30 UTC  

Europe became tourism country

2017-04-01 21:04:32 UTC  

Europeans sort of imagined themselves in position to use their "sophistication" and vast American resources and potential to make some kind of perfect match

2017-04-01 21:04:50 UTC  

in 19th, Europeans countries were powerful

2017-04-01 21:05:03 UTC  

But in reality, Europeans only wanted welfare state, decolonization and negrification = less responsibility

2017-04-01 21:05:26 UTC  

European reflex in relation to America was "Dear Lord, let's transfer our responsibilities accross the pond"

2017-04-01 21:05:52 UTC  

"We need, to decolonize ? Good, just keep an eye on our safety and shit"

2017-04-01 21:06:17 UTC  

Sometimes, even though Americans complain about it for all the wrong reasons

2017-04-01 21:06:29 UTC  

They are right when they callit European "rot"

2017-04-01 21:07:13 UTC  

Post-revolution europeans

2017-04-01 21:07:28 UTC  

Because that's how Europeans perceived themselves, as geriatric, high tech shop clerks and wine tasters

2017-04-01 21:09:04 UTC  

the WW1 suicide of Europe was basically caused by French and German diplomacy

2017-04-01 21:09:20 UTC  

WW I was caused by the Germans

2017-04-01 21:09:44 UTC  

Europe was doomed with abolition of monarchy

2017-04-01 21:10:38 UTC  

Europe's response to consequences of war was equally childish and reeking of desire to avoid future responsibility

2017-04-01 21:10:58 UTC  

It was always "we must come closer and be loving and embracing so we don't have any wars"

2017-04-01 21:11:20 UTC  

It was never the consequence that naturally result from war, that is, subjugation and conquest and domination

2017-04-01 21:11:42 UTC  

The tragedy of WW I is only greater thanks to the almost incredible fact that Germany was able to start another war

2017-04-01 21:11:43 UTC  

Napoleon waged war accross Europe, the germans, as a consequence, formed the nation and took revenge in 1870, they reenacted the same policy during WW1 & WW2

2017-04-01 21:11:51 UTC  

these 2 countries depleted Europe

2017-04-01 21:12:01 UTC  

Which is solely fault of British stupidity and arrogance, and French incompetence

2017-04-01 21:12:15 UTC  

of a new system

2017-04-01 21:12:21 UTC  

abolition of monarchy

2017-04-01 21:12:33 UTC  

The fact that Germany wasn't fully and frontally invaded in 1939 while it was herself invading Poland, is notorious incompetence

2017-04-01 21:12:33 UTC  

kill of monarchs

2017-04-01 21:12:41 UTC  

"dalits" who get the power

2017-04-01 21:12:49 UTC  

And I'm not saying this out of malice towards Germans at all

2017-04-01 21:12:53 UTC  

This is just common sense

2017-04-01 21:13:44 UTC  

British always approched Germans with that senseof arrogance and completely unwarranted confidence

2017-04-01 21:13:55 UTC  

instead of an alliance with germans in 1940's

2017-04-01 21:14:00 UTC  

we chose war

2017-04-01 21:14:10 UTC  

Alliance was impossible

2017-04-01 21:14:19 UTC  

But Germany should've been invaded in 1939

2017-04-01 21:14:53 UTC  

Because France and Britain pledged to do so, and had responsibility to do so, in respect to their fallen in WW I and for the sake of sparring another generation of well born people of slaughter

2017-04-01 21:14:54 UTC  

France was a liberal country with a fucked up government

2017-04-01 21:15:11 UTC  

Soviet Union was ironically, the last saving grace for Britain and France

2017-04-01 21:15:13 UTC  

Britain, i don't know, but they didn't xant wxar too

2017-04-01 21:15:23 UTC  

Because all the millions killed in the east would have had to fall in the west instead

2017-04-01 21:15:28 UTC  

Soviet Union just fucked up Europe