Sight distances that contradict the globe model

yeah but

i can't use that as proof for anything

Explain earthquake shadow zones, Z, and I'll stop believing the mainstream narrative.

since photos can be eddited

Then stay a globie.

yeah but what i'm saying

That's an admission of inability then

You would edit your own photo?

Got it

neither of us can prove each other wrong

so either of us could be right

since no one can tell if we've edited our own photos to make ourselves look right or not

You take your own photos. You don't need to show me

@Citizen Z listen to @gohan and give us an explanation for earthquake shadowzones

Earthquakes have never been shown to only work on a globe model. Dont be stupid.

@All Of The Above Do you actually know what shadow zones are?

Not earthquakes

The shadow zones

yeh

Two different things Z

zones blocked by the core

Not really

Its based on a mathematical construct

Not science.

Just areas that lack seismic activity after an earthquake

On a globe, this would be explained by the core

I don't care about your assumed seismic bullshit

How do you explain it on a Flat Earth?

oi citizen z buddy why u swearing

be a good example

It isn't "bullsjit6" if it's been recorded

And since people's lives depend on accurate seismic predictions, I'd say they're pretty real

is swearing allowed by the server guidelines?

Lol recorded into an assumed model. What's a model?

citizen z whats gravity

It isn't recorded "into an assumed model"

What is gravity?

It's just what seismographs detect

Seismographs don't assume the shape of the Earth

They just measure the intensity of vibrations