ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS

for example, supreme court upholding disparate impact challenges under the fair housing act

ENTIRELY

LAWYERS ARE NOT LEADERS

THEY ARE BUSINESSMEN WHO DEPEND ON A MONOPOLY

my fave super hero is a lawyer

i'm going to law school

are you blind

I'm a lawyer

spiritually blind

nice

nice

how bad does it suck

I like my job. but i'm in a specific niche I made a lot of sacrifices to get into

yes

lawyering seems hard

and greasy

like a greasy sort of affair

did you sacrifice your soul

it's a big field. there are greasy areas and fine areas. diversity_is_racism is right about lawyers and leadership/policy. They shouldn't be making decisions.

I didn't sacrifice my soul. I'm doing exactly what I wanted to do and it's really interesting. But I know a lot of people who did.

lawyers who get paid to defend child molestors shouldn't make laws to begin with

or advocate or anything

i dunno man it seems like they take cash no matter what

why cant we just go back to public executions

like in the center of town square

leave the bodies rot in the open so ppl wont want to break laws

most lawyers defending child molesters get paid dogshit by the state as public defenders

well

i mean thats good

dont defend the shitty public ud get paid more

I and Foucault agree with you on public executions

its save us so much money and time

esp if its proven without a doubt

just takem from the court to the hangin block

or heck even pillarys

those are fun

Pillorys

i think the prison system is a joke tbh

its too cushy compared to some places. its a money grab as well. and the "death row" people who never actually get killed at the end of the day costs the tax payers more than what some folk make in a year

i think what we should do is do a clean sweep of the prison system once the wall is buily