a system without drawn borders does not exist

Right but do those borders have to be clear and legal

or can they be softer and cultural

THEY MUST BE CULTURAL AND LEGAL

But let's say they're only cultural

what's the argument for making them true legal boundaries

IF SOMETHING IS GOOD, WHY NOT MAKE IT LEGAL?

AND IF YOU DO NOT, IT WILL BE ATTACKED USING THE LAW

your second point is really good I think

that's what's happening

THIS IS THE PROBLEM WITH THE LAW

I PREFER RULE BY ARISTOCRATS

ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS

for example, supreme court upholding disparate impact challenges under the fair housing act

ENTIRELY

LAWYERS ARE NOT LEADERS

THEY ARE BUSINESSMEN WHO DEPEND ON A MONOPOLY

my fave super hero is a lawyer

i'm going to law school

are you blind

I'm a lawyer

spiritually blind

nice

nice

how bad does it suck

I like my job. but i'm in a specific niche I made a lot of sacrifices to get into

yes

lawyering seems hard

and greasy

like a greasy sort of affair

did you sacrifice your soul

it's a big field. there are greasy areas and fine areas. diversity_is_racism is right about lawyers and leadership/policy. They shouldn't be making decisions.

I didn't sacrifice my soul. I'm doing exactly what I wanted to do and it's really interesting. But I know a lot of people who did.

lawyers who get paid to defend child molestors shouldn't make laws to begin with

or advocate or anything

i dunno man it seems like they take cash no matter what

why cant we just go back to public executions

like in the center of town square

leave the bodies rot in the open so ppl wont want to break laws

most lawyers defending child molesters get paid dogshit by the state as public defenders

well