Message from @custer
Discord ID: 316977672938848257
especially that is more so in agrarian families and shepherd families
the relegation of man's dignty by modern conservatives
to that of a working bee
is a criminal protestant-judaic-teutonic liberal-matriarchal concoction which needs to be sent back to hell from which it emerged
even more so, the basic goods for a society, for day to day use
are par exellence a product of female intellect
it is male's intellect which produces long lasting cultural products which survive to this day
namely weapons, art, temples, and such
as far as female products go, it's usually just pottery
man is a nature's being of borderlines, of frontier
he hunts, scouts, makes defenses
it isn't a coincidence that the most masculine and patriarchal ideals were always born there, where existed a strong "border" identity
what
ok buddy
nah he's right
im sure he is but i dunno wtf hes on about
He's saying that the modern "conservative" conception of masculinity in the family context is that of a "provider" role. He makes the money and provides for the material needs of the family.
isaac antsee thinks that i don't feel a need to say something unless provokd by someone's flattering interest
what
no i dont
i just dont get what that has to do with me
@UOC there's more than that. there are more other completely flawed conceptions of conservative ideals
it does not
well okay
i didn't even quote you
earlier
but idk
sure but I'm just summarizing your comments about the role of the male in the family context.
sorry for asking what you meant
the first half anyway
lmfao
clarification is suppression ig
needless to say, what male himself does not understand, the society immediatelly accepts, and starts seeing him in his new dignty
can a king defeat a president in battle
Oh now.
No*
I had to apologize for a joke
It was dumb
"You dont need thick skin youve plenty scars"