perhaps

Not sure huh?

Talking of Darth Traya made me listen to the Kotor soundtrack on you tube. Man those were the star wars days

Considering the Codex Sianaticus is A) older, B) in the same language as the gospels and C) Not written by a Power Hungry Roman

I think that the Greek copy is right and the Receptus is wrong

sort of like multiplication maybe?

okay

Could be division as well

Also at the time of writing Codex Sianaticus was still written under the Eastern Roman Empire prior to Byzantium

yes, we always look for the earliest forms

of course there could have been deception going on back then too

for either

There is one other translation that is older, and that is the Peshitta, however it is in Aramaic, not the original written language of the Gospel

hmm... I thought that the original languages of the bible were "Hebrew" (Phoenician-Canaanite) - Old Testament and
Aramaic and Greek - New Testament

Here is the Aramaic Peshitta verse

looks very Persian / Arabic

Aramaic is the mother language of both Persian and Arabic yes

I know ^^

Similar to how Phoenecian is our mother tongue as well as to Latin

yes

I'm thinking both 666 and 616 could be right from gematria of Latin vs hebrew

yes, with Greek and Old Italic before Latin

However, there is a catch

Nron Qsr

What does that mean?

That's the Hebrew Peshitta

NOT the Aramaic one

Greek and Hebrew say 666, Latin says 616, that's 2:1, let's translate the Aramaic one maybe we can get a tie?

666 also relates to the Giza Pyramids:
The number 666 is the sum of numbers from 1 to 36 forming the so-called Magickal Seal of Sun, a grid of 6x6.

Yes there might also be clues to this in the book of the dead! The Israelites took great knowledge with them when they left Egypt

Latin drops the second נ . I'm thinking they both can spell out the Same term in their respective languages

hmm

It's also worth noting that different languages even between Hebrew and Aramaic have different interpretations

Also the Babylonian numerical system back then wasn't what we have now.

The Romans used MXLCVII

yes

So they would have said Six hundred and sixty and six

like the old films

among other things ^^

The concept of addition was present however

I found the Aramaic verse, I am unable to translate the Aramaic Peshitta Revelations 13:18 what it says is your guess is as good as mine unless I try to learn Aramaic from scratch