You didn't even attempt to disprove anything I've said. You just said my drawing "proved nothing".
On a flat plane, you cannot have several people looking in opposite directions while all seeing the same exact things in the sky. On a globe, you can have several people see the Southern polar star. Take an orange and mark two arrows pointing towards the little brown stump thing on the bottom, and both arrows are on opposite sides of the brown dot on the orange's bottom, representing two people looking at the same point on a globe. They are in different locations, but looking at the same object which is **possible**. Then peel the orange so the peel is flat and level for the two arrows. They are now facing opposite directions, meaning them seeing the same point is **impossible**.

I also already explained why the star trails diverge from the equatorial trail.

Prove your claim

Which claim?

That star trails are imoossible on a flat earth?

I posted it

Show me video of two people south of equator looking at the same star who are looking the exact same direction with compass visible and on two different continents at the same time with a map that is perfectly accurate to verify it all

Live on a Google hangout or live video

Then we will have something to talk about

Prove your claim

Has nothing to do with flat earth

Prove the globe model map.

Prove magnetic declination and compass directions are true

Prove this on two separate continents simultaneously in live unedited video

Prove to me magnetic lines are perfectly straight and do not curve

You have a huge up hill battle for your claim. You should probably rent a big science vessel to do the appropriate studies. Could take a few years

Good luck

I've got proof your claim could easily not be true. Magnetic declination in Australia doesnt seem to be perfectly accurate. That would be a huge difference over thousands of miles

Also there is evidence Australia compass directions do not line up with the globe maps such as google earth

Globalists just assumes they're right just because teachers told them so at school

vbfeuwhvghysudcbsgfvryn bnidbguidfnkg

!mute @Salt & Pepper (retarded cat.)

Salt & Pepper (Lonely)#5126 (401445171591643146) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>

Kalerteth, which part of my proof revolves around relying on school taught subjects?

@Quorum School subjects give you knowledgr

Im thinking more critcally

They didn't teach me this in school 🤦

Stop giving indoctrination speeches :/

Heard them all already.

Also, here you go Z.
These are two places below the equator that are opposite of each other, Australia and South America.

In reality, no matter the model, basically everyone agrees that Polaris is not visible from South of the equator. Meaning they aren't looking at Polaris by deduction.

Ergo (first and last time I'm saying ergo), they're looking at *another* point.

Also, literally anyone South of the equator can see this.

Basically

In your reality

Polaris isnt visible due to perspective

Yet people see Polaris south of equator