Message from @Kalerteth

Discord ID: 550791108871847936


2019-02-28 21:16:11 UTC  

Mod abuse

2019-02-28 21:16:21 UTC  

Lul

2019-02-28 21:17:06 UTC  

@Quorum listen, you said something about Polaris, I responded about Polaris,
then you tried telling me the star trails aren't of Polaris.
I never said the star trails were of Polaris.
I think this is a misunderstand and I'm done with it.

2019-02-28 21:17:16 UTC  

Mod abuse

2019-02-28 21:17:21 UTC  
2019-02-28 21:17:25 UTC  

stop muting randomw people

2019-02-28 21:17:27 UTC  
2019-02-28 21:17:27 UTC  

i'm not a fish (I swear)#6006 (423485257229008907) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>

2019-02-28 21:17:34 UTC  

<:thonk:485324336874651650>

2019-02-28 21:17:50 UTC  

I thought you meant that in my reality, I also thought that Polaris was below the equator

2019-02-28 21:18:05 UTC  

Polaris is the north star

2019-02-28 21:18:24 UTC  

You said "yet people see polaris below the equator". You said that right after saying "so in your reality"

2019-02-28 21:18:36 UTC  

The wording confused me.

2019-02-28 21:20:24 UTC  

Ok np

2019-02-28 21:23:09 UTC  

People do see Polaris below the equator

2019-02-28 21:23:30 UTC  

Which shouldn't happen on a globe. Another claim for a mirage

2019-02-28 21:24:36 UTC  

It's only just barely under the equator, which I'm pretty sure the article said

2019-02-28 21:25:30 UTC  

It starts to fade the more south you get from the equator

2019-02-28 21:25:35 UTC  

"Under typical atmospheric conditions, this adds 0.57° to an object’s altitude, so Polaris would barely show up from 1.23° south latitude."

2019-02-28 21:25:50 UTC  

The two points I listed are way further down the equator.

2019-02-28 21:27:13 UTC  

Deducing things from the spherical model is wrong to begin with

2019-02-28 21:28:35 UTC  

What? I concluded that the point in those photos is not Polaris, meaning it is a different point in the sky using simple deduction. Idk what you mean tbh

2019-02-28 21:29:41 UTC  

K. Please show me your measurements of the surface

2019-02-28 21:29:48 UTC  

Interested.

2019-02-28 21:30:05 UTC  

What kind of measurements?

2019-02-28 21:30:31 UTC  

Measurements of the earth curving at the globe math given

2019-02-28 21:30:47 UTC  

1 sec

2019-02-28 21:32:28 UTC  

Someone told me about the 8 inches per mile squared thing, he said this: "8 inches per mile squared calculation is a parabolic approximation of a circle, rather than a linear drop off."

2019-02-28 21:35:25 UTC  

Ships going to the horizon will start to dissapear from the bottom of the mass to the top. This is bc the horizon is curved or round

2019-02-28 21:35:51 UTC  

On a flat earth the boat would just get smaller and smaller until it disappeared.

2019-02-28 21:37:23 UTC  

Brb in like 5-10 mins or somethin

2019-02-28 21:38:08 UTC  

@jlegend wrong

2019-02-28 21:38:24 UTC  

How

2019-02-28 21:38:46 UTC  

@jlegend things disappear from the bottom up because that's how light works

2019-02-28 21:41:11 UTC  

It is bc the ship is going past the curved horizon

2019-02-28 21:41:20 UTC  

When you are standing on the beach and looking into the distance, the farther you look, the more shallow the angle becomes. Once that angle of light bouncing of the objects in the distance hits .02 degrees, the light becomes unresolvable. Think of a boat as trillions of photons of light coming to your eye. When that light hits a certain angle, it's not longer resolved

2019-02-28 21:42:27 UTC  

@jlegend your last comment. that's the reason the globe gives. Its assumed. It is not science. Its just an assumption based of thinking you live on a ball. No measurements, nothing.

2019-02-28 21:42:53 UTC  

Based on my reason

2019-02-28 21:42:58 UTC  

The correct reason

2019-02-28 21:43:04 UTC  

We live on a round earth

2019-02-28 21:43:12 UTC  

And I hate to tell you but its incorrect