Hypothesis 1
Hypothesis 2

Same.

What abt the fact that with a telescope you can see other planets that are spheres

Or the fact that satalites orbit the earth

And the fact that it's night on one half of the earth and day on the other side

balloons with relay antennae

ha ha

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_balloon_satellite

balloon satellite constellation relay network

If the earth is shaped like that

Then explain a lunar eclipse

The earth projects it's shadow of a round earth

Satellites are seen moving at 17,500 mph. They also don't look like those balloons.

What abt the people who have been to the international space station

And have said the earth is round

@jlegend What cause and effect experiment has been done, (i.e. placing a big balloon at a specific location to cast a custom shadow on the moon) to prove the Earth is the cause of the shadow, red, blue colors on the moon? The Heliocentric model does not predict them, the Saros cycle does and was based on a Flat Earth cosmology using pattern recognition.

@Human Sheeple Were you the one that did the modeling to show that a selenelion is possible on a globe?

I had a bet with the dragon, I used the dragon's numbers, boom the selenelion worked. My reaction was to the dragon "It's a globe!" The dragon said "No because we can't detect curvature"

So I said how the heck can we explain this on FE?

Superimposition of coherent light waves

Destructive interference

It then dawned on me that everything fit too perfectly, no refraction, light travelling in straight lines, I came to the conclusion that out of all the other globe evidence that "didn't fit" and this one that did that the Globe itself is directly derived from the study of the OCCULT.

How did you make the selenelion work, I'm wondering.

Shaving off small angles off all three axis

Cutting corners

Cutting corners?

Scaling Invariance doesn't wash with this, the distances to size ratio matches everything, to me it's the strongest evidence of the Globe I have seen

By far

So it was able to work within a particular area and that allowed a few degrees off to still work the lunar eclipse?

you can't just shave a few degrees of two axis, it won't work, it MUST have 3 axis corner cutting

So I am of the opinion the only way to verify the Earth is circumnavigate all 3 axis non stop in a straight line. If there's an edge, it's a plane, if no edge on all 3 axis, it's an oblate spheroid

Well, the primary issue was with the 2d plane for the lunar eclipse, sun being not directly aligned with the earth and moon.
I'm not familiar with modeling so I'm not quite sure what you mean, but what exactly does it take to make the selenelion work on the globe regarding its position. Do you have to change the sun's apparent position?

I'm not convinced the Earth is the cause.

Another method to prove the model would be predict which part of the "Globe" is supposed to be causing the shadow, fly a very big balloon up in the sky and cast a custom shadow on the moon

I'm aware, I was just interested that in your modeling showing selenelion working on a globe perfectly, exactly how has it been determined?