@charles watson It seems that WN1.0 appeals to those who missed out on it the first time around. It may also appeal because it's simple. Simple messages for simple people.

say I have taken the test, investigated the type description and found the information to be inaccurate. What then?

then I imagine you will confirm your opinions

but insights I have gained through MBTI remain

so I will retain mine

its impossible to "disprove" MBTI to me

it can only be refined

a natural democratic result. You give the proles power in society, there understanding of a greater order is there, but limited

on the other hand

maybe you will find the information

not to be "accurate"

Democracy is death.

but to be insightful, valuable

(also accurate)

It would appear that if both of our findings can be correct then that poses as issue for MBTI

yeah, sure

while you could be a number of types, INTPs are those with this level of skepticism

a problem that assumes consistency is a pre-requisite for validity

generally

I think its pretty much a given you are an INTx

INTJ's = MasterRace

is the truth not true if it isn't confirmable?

bring a wide enough net to an area in which fish are known to congregate and I am sure you will catch something

but why throw stones from outside

when you could see for yourself

come in

Personally, I don't like being quantified by some test.

like an IQ test?

all these criticisms are resting on unstated assumptions. You guys seem to be differing on what you think the test is supposed to reveal

I would caution against assuming the experience of others in conversation.

tests are reconition of pattern, not the whole

well I mean

you could just tell me

*recognition

I will assume away in good faith

until proven otherwise

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ , after all that buddy you've GOT to take the test

@charles watson This could explain why Asians score so high on IQ tests but act like robots without inspiration.

http://jupiter-34.appspot.com/

relinked for convenience.

and cheating on tests also