not to be "accurate"

Democracy is death.

but to be insightful, valuable

(also accurate)

It would appear that if both of our findings can be correct then that poses as issue for MBTI

yeah, sure

while you could be a number of types, INTPs are those with this level of skepticism

a problem that assumes consistency is a pre-requisite for validity

generally

I think its pretty much a given you are an INTx

INTJ's = MasterRace

is the truth not true if it isn't confirmable?

bring a wide enough net to an area in which fish are known to congregate and I am sure you will catch something

but why throw stones from outside

when you could see for yourself

come in

Personally, I don't like being quantified by some test.

like an IQ test?

all these criticisms are resting on unstated assumptions. You guys seem to be differing on what you think the test is supposed to reveal

I would caution against assuming the experience of others in conversation.

tests are reconition of pattern, not the whole

well I mean

you could just tell me

*recognition

I will assume away in good faith

until proven otherwise

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ , after all that buddy you've GOT to take the test

@charles watson This could explain why Asians score so high on IQ tests but act like robots without inspiration.

http://jupiter-34.appspot.com/

relinked for convenience.

and cheating on tests also

I have taken these tests and investigated these types only to find the results wanting

there's a lot of issues with most of the stuff online

let me be your guide, if you end up in the same spot

so be it

that's the worst that could happen anyway

the computer tests are aparently dubious

My mother paid a professional to administer an MBTI test when I was 13.

useless

testing 13 year olds wouldn't even be in-universe ethical

I have my own ideas about that but