so naturally I look down on hte clothes that faciltate it

So long as its tempered by moral and societal structure its understandable

I mean there is a difference between the strong quiet man in a fine suit and a loudmouth rich idiot in a fine suit

Unfortunately people tend to go for the latter.

donald.jpg

Now men dress like faggots and women have tattoos and rainbow hair

I don't like suits

I have my own whole idea of what sort of clothes are better

Cant blame you.

pre industrial euro clothes were much better

all loose and flowing

weather protection by default, cloaks and stuff

So like 1700s

I'd go earlier

faggy victorian autism was going on then

Also remember that in the 20s-40s cloth was american made and sturdier than today

this should exist even less than modern mens' suits https://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thing?.out=jpg&size=l&tid=64832719

Debatable.

Better than modern womens clothes

I mean just for te lulz I say we go back to the romans

I'd support that in a second

TOGAS, TOGAS,TOGAS!

absolutely

makes perfect sense too

that was solid clothing

I was partly joking.

Also the chant was an Animal House reference

Out of curiousity; what got you into the mental ward biz?

bad career choices

How so?

Not exactly a lot of peoples first choice and assuming that goes for you.

out of all options available to me it was the least revolting

but the whole mess I am not happy with

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/d4/92/86/d49286c0dcc3ca8cc64994fa58a60c0f--roman-fashion-roma-antigua.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/09/a5/9b/09a59b8d213cb42388fcf675bc6cdd3d--roman-clothes-roman-costumes.jpg

vastly less retarded than now

By far

Personally Renissance clothing is a pretty good balance

Renissance-1700s was probably the Zenith for Western Civ

I am fine with this level of simplicity

1800s-1900s was the apex and decline