Message from @charles watson

Discord ID: 375387625747382272


2017-11-01 20:53:29 UTC  

THE NORM IS NO STANDARD BY WHICH YOU SHOULD JUDGE YOURSELF

2017-11-01 20:53:38 UTC  

My dad had potential though, but needed guidance

2017-11-01 20:53:40 UTC  

what percentile would you place yourself in, hagel?

2017-11-01 20:53:51 UTC  

WHEN MEASURING MYSELF AGAINST MY OWN STANDARDS, I FALL WAY WAY WAY SHORT

2017-11-01 20:53:53 UTC  

AS IT SHOULD BE

2017-11-01 20:54:11 UTC  

Spade, for IQ, I'm only a bit above average

2017-11-01 20:54:17 UTC  

couldn't join mensa

2017-11-01 20:54:34 UTC  

For athleticism and skill, I am considerably above average, though

2017-11-01 20:54:44 UTC  

Oh,

2017-11-01 20:54:46 UTC  

125 AND ABOVE IS BETTER THAN 90% OF THE POPULATION AT THIS POINT.

2017-11-01 20:54:53 UTC  

there's a thing called N-Back which I excel at

2017-11-01 20:54:58 UTC  

if there was a mensa for that, I might be able to join

2017-11-01 20:55:22 UTC  

Basically, you see squares light up on a grid, and you hear letters be spoken

2017-11-01 20:55:36 UTC  

then if the same letter or the same grid is activated, a certain amount of turns later, you have to react to that

2017-11-01 20:55:38 UTC  

continiously

2017-11-01 20:55:43 UTC  

depends on which population you're talking about

2017-11-01 20:56:03 UTC  

global iq is lowering at an increasing rate

2017-11-01 20:56:14 UTC  

People used to be smarter in the past

2017-11-01 20:56:15 UTC  

that's true

2017-11-01 20:56:21 UTC  

Not only due to race mixing, but general dysgenics

2017-11-01 20:56:24 UTC  

global IQ is 86

2017-11-01 20:56:28 UTC  

is it actually

2017-11-01 20:56:34 UTC  

I SPEAK OF THE WHITE FOLK, WHOSE AVERAGE IQ HAS BEEN DWINDLING THIS PAST CENTURY

2017-11-01 20:56:35 UTC  

fucking christ

2017-11-01 20:57:06 UTC  

I think that the degradation of genes can explain the fall of many empires

2017-11-01 20:58:33 UTC  

I know what I am, I have found my place in the order

2017-11-01 20:58:36 UTC  

The order doesn't exist

2017-11-01 20:59:39 UTC  

Whether this or that individual should be bred, should have a few children only, or have no children at all is not an interesting philosophical question, as it is a mere particularity. If he is above average, he should breed more than average, and that depends on the circumstances

2017-11-01 20:59:52 UTC  

An average person from the past would be above average today, and today it would be good to breed him

2017-11-01 21:01:22 UTC  

STUDY: Humans love dogs more than other people...

2017-11-01 21:01:38 UTC  

That sounds plausible

2017-11-01 21:01:43 UTC  

who wouldn't

2017-11-01 21:01:50 UTC  

other than islams

2017-11-01 21:01:52 UTC  

Human cultures today don't have any coherence, there is no shared purpose or value

2017-11-01 21:01:58 UTC  

Dogs, on the other hand, become part of the pack

2017-11-01 21:02:03 UTC  

they hunt together with the human, etc

2017-11-01 21:04:04 UTC  

consider your biases may condition you to draw correllations as causation

2017-11-01 21:04:38 UTC  

my biggest problem with this discusion is that there is no separation between correlation and causation in anyone's assertions

2017-11-01 21:04:58 UTC  

What are some examples of when people may have confused the two, from today?

2017-11-01 21:06:05 UTC  

"President Trump, instead of politicizing and dividing America, which he always seems to do at times of national tragedy, should be focusing on the real solution — anti-terrorism funding — which he proposed cutting in his most recent budget," Schumer said.

2017-11-01 21:06:17 UTC  

To be fair, now