Message from @Roberto
Discord ID: 376869627923398656
wonder if any whites were caught in it or just americans
Quoting CNN as a "reputable" news source; or, just using them at all, is like winning the special olympics...... You're still retarded
That's a good saying. You should make that into a meme
Just your average "run of the mouth' day. Kind of like: Life Hack: Shut Your Fucking Mouth
You could make that a meme as well
No info on shooter?
Mid 20s white
Victims are all white
It wasn't a fedora, was it?
NEW: Authorities have preliminarily identified TX church shooter as white male in his mid-20s from outside San Antonio, sources tell @ABC.
Dunno what type of hat
THE GNAA HAS TROLLED CONGRESS. AND HIS NAME WAS SAM HYDE. https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/927300884417204228
Wwow they did it
CNN is as easy to trick as my wifes cat with the same laser pointer after 9 years of the same trick
Im not even fixing that run on sentence. Deal with it
why do christians ever think it's wrong to do polygamy
I cannot understand that
"We proudly share our Abrahamic faith with Judaism, the Chosen People(tm)!" ->read about Abraham->second thing he's famous for, after Isaac, is knocking up a bunch of other women besides his wife
I'm not a Christian but I'm opposed to polygamy because it's dysgenic behavior.
His facebook
LOL
I was born um, in a decade that borders the 90s
does anyone have a picture of him yet
how is polygamy dysgenic
and most importantly, how did you draw that conclusion?
like we can pretty easily say marxism is dysgenic or catholicism is dysgenic based on looking at history, we have some actual evidence
but how can you drop the hammer on polygamy exactly, and based on what data?
I guess for starters, what groups did you compare?
Was wondering how polygamy is dysgenic as well
you could speculate that it would be eugenic as men below a cutoff couldn't breed while those above a cutoff could breed explosively
which would be both positive and negative eugenics at the same time, assuming the sexual selection worked in a beneficial direction
@Spiritchef WE KNOW HE WAS CLINICALLY RETARDED.
I suppose he would argue that paternal variance leads to more diverse offspring and is more likely to produce an offspring that has a beneficial mutation?
I could be wrong and it could be the world's worst possible idea, but I can't say either way without data
WHO WANTS TO VOICE CHAT TONIGHT?
that still makes assumptions though
yeah ultimately everything we come up with is reasoning from assumptions