https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lq30gSOjJ8

@zeusbolt in other words, altright is not a valuable social brand. There is no reason for a person to go "Oh, he is altright, I can count on him to have the following valuable characteristics that make him worth associating with," as opposed to other social brands

altright is probably a dead brand i agree

WE CAN MAKE IT A VALUABLE BRAND

that's what I am trying to point out

THESE DIFFERENT IDEAS ARE CONVERGING

milo, spencer, 4chan killedi t

FORM A CULTURE

I THINK SPENCER IS DOING GREAT

4CHAN IS ROCKING OUT

you keep spelling it wrong, it's "Spenther"

4chan is low quality and spencer is an idiot

Yeah

Spence has become a liability imo

Wish he would shut up for a bit

@diversity_is_racism if that's the case, doesn't that mean people ought to be recruited to the altright to build the brand? find ultra intense passionate adventurous types, recruit them to represent the brand, just like a company would.

Issue: incentives vs risks

spencer associates with shit, blames other people for his mistakes, etc

there is a reason twitter unbanned him last year

@Exilarch YES. WE DO THAT BY LEADING AND ATTRACTING.

spencer is a prop

twitter shuts down his alternative accounts while leaving his main one up and even letting it become verified

most recent TDS is a good case for this

he was on it

@diversity_is_racism ...and sticking up for your own team

@Exilarch enforced morality may not be as bad as average people make it out to be

libertarianism rejects this and look what you get

people taking their shirts off and dancing around at conferences

Why does nobody ever point out that "Trending" articles are literally just global announcements/pinned topics renamed with the implication that they are organically popular at a grassroots level?

fidget spinners are a very good example of paid viral marketing

it definitely wouldnt have gotten so popular were it not for how much shilling was goin gon

Silly geese complaining about Lord of the Rings: https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2014/dec/12/tolkiens-myths-are-a-political-fantasy

power struggle over ring->ring gives power->was created by powerful people->who?->elves

guy farts around with elves->omg elves worried about ring, sumthin goin down lol->omg ring gives powarr->omg elves are the ones who made it!!! Dun dun DUNNN~!

thus, reversing the format allows working up the chain of "why?" questions to become plot twists

Man in a desert writes a book

man in a desert writes a book->book causes a huge war

man in a desert writes a book->book contains esoteric semi-sorcery knowledge->book causes a huge war over how the knowledge ought to be used. Part of the struggle is d/t side effect of the sorcery

the way the book works, you make a wish, you can get the wish, however something bad happens to you, the wish is granted in such a way that it burns you ultimately, UNLESS you sacrifice to it by harming others to offset it.

this creates the ideologic schism. Some say that, since it is inevitable people will be harmed by the sorcery, it's important to round up the worst of society and use them as human cattle to sacrifice for the betterment of man

THE CULLING, 427 PAGES