that dumb little "words don't hurt" doctrine is why white people are shit talking pussies now

because nobody bombs them in the face for talking shit

Yeah

I see it as basically a challenge to defend both your companion, and your masculinity

If you rise to the challenge, you are immature, petty, "trolled", etc. If you do not rise to the challenge, you are a beta, pussy, faggot, etc. It's an attack which intrinsically provokes a physically violent response, because there is no winning argument against it. And baiting violence is not really great for a dialogue

people only have that attitude because a person being mad has no consequence

if they actually did something about it 100% of the time nobody would say taht

in my experience, anyone who says nasty things about your woman on the internet is severely triggered and emotionally lashing out

so in the absence of stabbing proximity, it's easy to just make them run away

did Rebekah888 end up banned? same problem. always with the trans stuff

not banned that I see

but unproductive either way

the guy who wrote Conan said "Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing."

yeah

robert e howard has my exact worldview

I am a conanist

haha me too

this is why we're friends lol

Let teachers and philosophers brood over questions of reality and illusion. I know this: if life is illusion, then I am no less an illusion, and being thus, the illusion is real to me. I live, I burn with life, I love, I slay, and am content.

http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-the-ancient-empires-fall-the-dark-skinned-peoples-fade-and-even-the-demons-of-antiquity-gasp-their-robert-e-howard-238767.jpg

I don't even believe in nazism

just aryan barbarianism

blond haired warbands

dude

that quote

Is a good quote

To me, it's interesting that even pro-Caucasian people today treat National Socialism from the point of view and propaganda of the allies (hence the predominant use of the term "Nazism", a wholly Jewish journalism invention, look it up, which is just an indicator). It should give you a clue that what you are talking about "not believing" is not the real thing, but a distorted, simplified, and probably different thing from what was originally proposed, @Exilarch.

Unfortunately, even "neo-Nazi" groups (see how they use the made up terms of the original enemies) base their identities and ideals in the farce created by propaganda, and not the original working gentlemen ethics flavor it had.

I know exactly what national socialism is. What it was conceived as, and what it became in practice, and I reject it

What exactly do you reject, I wonder.

A multitude of things

Go to the basics, the core

What do you reject

I reject socialism as an economic model, which it was supposed to have until Hitler killed Strasser and took over

I reject that Arabs are somehow more Aryan than Slavs, which Hitler claimed

Slavs > Arabs by far

@Pelagius you really do not know me very well

Ah

Hitler had an undeveloped soul

Well, here goes misunderstanding no. 01 and 02

I reject his fake Christianity hiding not only an atheism, but a dismissal of all spiritual matters