Message from @diversity_is_racism
Discord ID: 401393374826856458
i haven't noticed a drop in quality
amazon seems best for most purchases I find up here
Hahaha:
```What follows, then? That one had better put on gloves before reading the New Testament. The presence of so much filth makes it very advisable. One would as little choose “early Christians” for companions as Polish Jews: not that one need seek out an objection to them... Neither has a pleasant smell.```
—Friedrich "The Hammer" Nietzsche, *The Antichrist*, from **No. 46**
```The “early Christian”— and also, I fear, the “last Christian,” whom I may perhaps live to see— is a rebel against all privilege by profound instinct— he lives and makes war for ever for “equal rights.”...Strictly speaking, he has no alternative. When a man proposes to represent, in his own person, the “chosen of God”— or to be a “temple of God,” or a “judge of the angels”— then every other criterion, whether based upon honesty, upon intellect, upon manliness and pride, or upon beauty and freedom of the heart, becomes simply “worldly”— evil in itself... Moral: every word that comes from the lips of an “early Christian” is a lie, and his every act is instinctively dishonest— all his values, all his aims are noxious, but whoever he hates, whatever he hates, has real value... The Christian, and particularly the Christian priest, is thus a criterion of values.```
—*Ibid*
he makes some good points
I am reading "Culture of Critique"
@Chad Right , excellent!
@Josh , you might find this interesting: https://archive.org/details/TheScienceOfAnti-semitism_632
Alexander C. Cuza's essay (in 6 pages) 'The Science of Antisemitism'
Romania, 1922
Cuza was "the professor" to whom Codreanu, the honourable and valiant nationalist martyr, looked up to as an intellectual.
Thanks, I'll check it out
THREE STAGES IN THE MAKE-UP OF ANTI-SEMITISM
```
According to this theory of ours, in the make-up of anti-Semitism we must distinguish three stages: instinct, consciousness, science.
*Instinct* always made the crowd, firstly preoccupied by its immediate material interests, oppose Jewish parasitism through popular movements, often times general and bloody, as it was among many others all over, e.g., the terrible movement of the Cossacks in the Ukraine led by Bogdan Hmelnischy in which over 250,000 Jews perished in 1649.
*Consciousness* of the Jewish menace is awakened gradually, first in the educated classes. Then it spreads and penetrates the masses. The former group unites with the people in supporting their demands. The latter thus become progressively aware themselves.
*Science* begins with partial researches, until it reaches - only in our day – the determination of its objective, namely, studying Judaism as a social phenomenon, lifted out from the medium in which it seeks to hide, concluding that it is a human problem, in fact the biggest, whose solution must be found.
```
—Alexander C. Cuza, 'The Science of Antisemitism'
K
I am a Jew
I am subverting the altright slowly but surely
Every time people on altright chats screech about hating Jews I get together with my friends from synagogue and laugh about it over bagels
"Lmao the goyim don't know"
can all the socialist here raise their hand?
🖐
✋
💅
AT WRECKING NATIONS
EVEN IN NORTHERN EUROPE
IT HAS MADE PEOPLE MISERABLE
💯
str8 capitalism has about as bad a track record
They're both super dysfunctional
IT HAS A MUCH BETTER TRACK RECORD
IT FUNCTIONS
HOWEVER, NO ONE WOULD WANT CAPITALISM STRAIGHT
IT IS AN ECONOMIC SYSTEM, NOT A SOCIAL DESIGN.
THIS IS WHY HIERARCHY IS IMPORTANT
IF YOU HAVE HIGHER SOCIAL CASTES IN CHARGE, NO RACE TO THE BOTTOM
WHEN PROLES ARE IN CHARGE...
It doesn't function well at all. It suffers from destructive boom bust cycles. Worker wages get driven down while govt expenditures aren't allowed to rise. Thus most people can't afford to consume the value of the goods and services they provide. Sales drop and so do profits. The investment plutocracy pulls what profits are gained and funnels them into financial products resulting in speculative bubbles which pull even more money out of the productive economy. When they pop depression occurs. This was common place throughout the capitalist industrial world for two centuries until the great depression saw the replacement of capitalism with other systems like soc dem, fascism, socialism and Communism.
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES RISING IS A CONSEQUENCE OF DEMOCRACY
THE BOOM BUST CYCLE IS DRIVEN BY THE DISCOVERY OF NEW INDUSTRIES AND OVER-INVESTMENT BY CLUELESS PROLES
YOU HAD NONE OF THIS UNDER THE ARISTOCRATS
No the expenditures **aren't** allowed to rise
Also not true. The tulip mania of the 17th century happened while plenty of aristocrats and monarchs were in power
How about the south sea bubble?