Message from @Exilarch
Discord ID: 403310476597133324
you mean make time infinite
OR JUST REMOVE IT FROM OUR CAUSALITY CALCULUS
IF WE VIEW IDEAS AS RELATED, WITHOUT TIME, WE SEE FISH AS A FACET OF THE NOTION OF REALITY ITSELF
Removing it would be eternity which is basically a stagnant image of every single instance
WHICH MEANS THAT IT IS INEVITABLE
EVEN IF NOT IN A PARTICULAR INSTANT
NOT NECESSARILY STAGNANT
ONE IN WHICH ALL HAVE BEEN EXPRESSED
WITHOUT TIME, THERE IS NO STAGNATION
AND SINCE TIME IS A PRODUCT OF RELATIVITY...
1993: WHY DOES THIS BROWSER SUCK?
2018: WHY DOES THIS BROWSER SUCK?
AN ETERNAL CYCLE
how does the idea guarantee that stuff will shuffle around until it gets to be an instance
That's basically the implication here
I mean it's easy to sit here and point to a fish and say ah well it was inevitable eventually. Can you look into the underlying order and find me patterns which haven't had their day?
<:cordy:334703182049443852>
I just wanna know how it works mane.
like how you'd explain to a kid the way some device works
I'm pretty much done submitting
may as well flush them down the toilet
"Can you look into the underlying order and find me patterns which haven't had their day?" -- YES, AND SOME WRITERS HAVE DONE SO SUCCESSFULLY
@Exilarch I AM RATHER BACKLOGGED HERE THANKS TO THE PODCASTS
WHICH TAKE QUITE A BIT OF TIME
I WILL GET TO THEM AND SUBMISSIONS SENT BY OTHERS
AS I CAN
SORRY FOR THE DELAY.
example?
I got -23 on peggit for referring to Houseki no Kuni as "gemsluts"
spergs
Who's or what's Houseki again?
early catlady
JRR
The virgin CS Lewis vs the Chad Tolkien
LEWIS WAS IMPRESSIVE
HAVE YOU READ "OUT OF THE SILENT PLANET"?