I think the single most prevalent trait of people in the dissident political right wing is to constantly complain about every single doctrinal or conceptual point that is outside their highly specialized, fringe, and unlikely version of a perfect political reality

it is easy to say that when there is only one single ruling reality allowed

sometimes it makes sense. some ideas are toxic.

the problem is that the "alternatives" fit back into this reality

some people are anathema

like for example, the perpetual need to mechanichally regulated things, or in other words, "ethnostates"

I hope you aren't using me as a proxy for such tendencies

then there are groups which have a pretty damn long list of "demands"

like Christians for example

Christians demand that the Christian world-historic perspective never be brought into question at all

No

Just general observation

@UOC that was to AK

ah

Sorry

Ever hear of defector syndrome @UOC

no, tell me

It's a habit of radicals to marginalize themselves by using rhetoric that only appeals to the already converted

I have been watching a PERFECT example of that taking place

Within the keto / low-carb diet communities that now exist online, there is this dude named Shawn Baker who is pushing this purely meat diet.

and since he's gained a little following his rhetoric has exploded into aggressive and very marginalizing stuff that would really push anyone on the fence away and never convince even normal low-carb people

much less true normies

yeah dude

he used to cite studies and talk about healing peoples injuries and stuff lol

This sheep *wines* incessantly. <- W/b my comment.

Honestly that's hardly far off in exact verbage from other shit

You can make a Bullshit Generator out of it at this point

I am awaiting Baker's inevitable intersection with the alt right

maybe he can get Richard Spencer on an all meat diet and cure his flabby androgyny

Does eating meat fix lisps?

that's a study whose time has come

@Arthur Konrad I think you're making a good observation when you say that there is only one single ruling reality

good one lol

but I'm curious what you mean when you say "the problem is that the "alternatives" fit back into this reality"

you lost me there

the kind of reality where no foundations are going to be laid for any conceivable future

but only some very vague image of some kind of "management of the present" exists at best

So to put this back into Evolian terms, you're less interested in managing the decline and more interested in planning to rebuild. So people advocating half-measures solely aimed at managing decline aren't helping.

I'm not interested in either, but this is mere theoretizing

however