NNurturing this kind of personal Anarchism regarding 99% of things social, public, political and informative is what could promise a way out

BALKANIZATION IS INEVITABLE

AS DIVERSITY AND DEMOCRACY LOSE THE FAITH OF THE PEOPLE UNDER THEM, WE ARE SEEING A CAMPAIGN LIKE THE OVERTHROW OF THE SOVIETS

PEOPLE WANT TO BE ABLE TO OBSERVE WHAT IS TRUE AND SPEAK OF IT

THAT BREAKS DOWN THE NARRATIVE, AT WHICH POINT GOVERNMENT BECOMES UNCERTAIN

REGIME CHANGE IS INEVITABLE

@Arthur Konrad I don't think I have any problems with that, really. I think that would start things up nicely

Without this absolute sovereignty combined with complete anarchism regarding socially orchestrated reality, one cannot escape manipulation

@Arthur Konrad THAT IS ESSENTIALLY THE LIBERTARIAN VIEW, ANARCHY = FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION

HOWEVER, THE PROBLEM IS THE CROWD

SO GIVE THEM FREEDOM AND... REPEAT!

PEOPLE CANNOT ESCAPE MANIPULATION PERIOD

90% OF THEM ARE ENTIRELY FOLLOWERS

THE 9% CAN MAKE SOME CHOICES BUT USUALLY MISS THE BIGGER POINT

Yes, but out of anarchic situation can never follow libertarianism, that much is evident

YOUR TOP 1% OF NATURAL ELITES HAVE A CHANCE, BUT EVEN THEN, NEED SOME DISCIPLINE

out of anarchic moment always follows authoritarian rule, or primitivism at least

LIBERTARIANISM IS ESSENTIALLY ANARCHISM WITH MARKETS

SINCE MARKETS NATURALLY APPEAR THIS IS NOT ALTOGETHER WRONG

SIMPLY INCOMPLETE

@diversity_is_racism I don't think he is against organic leadership among the "anarchic" groups. They would not be government because they would be organic. They would be anarchic to our current regime. As for the herd, who cares? We'll take what we can get along the way and when we are able, after decades, to make our own infrastructure plus whatever minute influence we can have on the established Federation, we would be able to expand.

My views are related to opposing The System

I don't mean to seem naive or optimistic about this topic either.

I realize it might not work at all.

THE SYSTEM IS CREATED AUTOMATICALLY BY HERD BEHAVIOR

THIS IS WHY IT ARISES INDEPENDENTLY ACROSS CIVILIZATIONS

There needs to exist this kind of very flexible sense of evaluation that will be entirely found in principles

Take for example the msot banal discussion, like music - one will make a judgment on what to give attention to based on implied value system. Some things will naturally flow out of certain values, others will not be so apparent

Also a great flexibility in spiritual affairs, that needs to be in a positive sense, depersonalized, like a form of a positive subterranean spiritual framework, but that will be wholly pluralistic and founded in pluralism of forms, but singularity of substance

Is that what you think will have more breathing room with anti-System politics?

The idea is a secession on a personal and spiritual level, but starting with personal

SECESSION HAS ITS LIMITS

SIGNED, THE SOUTH

One must sense the outter world as being a some kind of externally growing organism that one could not possibly internalize

I DO NOT THINK THERE IS A ONE SIZE FITS ALL SOLUTION

PEOPLE ARE NOT EQUAL

THE ONLY SOLUTION THEREFORE BEGINS WITH RECOGNIZING THAT

I don't think he is basing his stance on equality though. Rather, that you can't change people, you can only change yourself.

Take a view out of your window, observe all the buildings, pavements, television sets, billboards, minorities, agitators, offices - literally as if they are flora growing out of the soil, a nasty kind of flora, a fungi

My concern is that maybe if we start with the personal that it will be the sole focus once that snowball gets going. Once you are on the path, you need to find fellow travellers.

Then again, starting with the personal might be all that we can do.