And you can't even formulate an actual theory.

"deeply critical of modern methods"

Written by a self-proclaimed nihilist and Nietzschean.

You use Evola's language without understanding what it means.

It involves rejecting muh realism.

In favor of "intellectual intuition".

Beholding the presence of God in the mind.

AND YOU ARE HERE TO HOLD MY PENIS AND SHOW ME THE RIGHT WAY?

FANTASTIC

I WILL DELEGATE MY STAFF TO TAKE NOTES

Unlike your collection of servile INTJ cohosts, I've actually read these authors.

The discussion group Everitt Foster held on evola reached no deeper than the hypocrisy of modernity and equality.

Which everyone who would attend would already know anyway.

Even in regards to the more pragmatic sides of Evola, I've never seen anyone discuss his "apoliticism" in relation to the errors the alt-right made regarding Trump.

Nor his explicit repudiation of mass-movements as a foundational method.

They just meme RIDE THAT TIGER BRO

Nor have I ever seen anyone mention that he thought Hitler was "possessed by demons".

In that sloganeering bit you just did, Evola himself would fall under what you label "THERE ARE THOSE WHO WANT TO RIDE DOWN THE COLLAPSE"

Even staying at the pragmatic level, he also explicitly repudiated enclavism and biological reductionism.

You have a problem when you list people like Evola and Nietzsche as high influences and do the opposite of what they said.

Without confronting it.

He also believed individuality was grounded in a hierarchy which began with the universal and proceeded to the specific.

The divine (God) --> Imperial Churchwarriors ---> Local State ---> Tribe ---> Human

From high to low

It is the Divine that is the Real.

A human becomes an Individual to the extent that he is able to foreground himself in the Divine Real and act from it on the material plane.

The Imperium on down can decay and crash, but the Divine fire remains.

Which is why his work moved toward Perennialism and Guenon.

Explicitly rejecting empiricism in favor of "intellectual intuition", which in Guenon's form is close to meaning "revelation".

Via serious, grounded belief in a Traditional Religion.

And conveyed via initiated circles, as the official religions decay.

From the Evolan point of view, the alt right is Titanic chair re-arranging.

And Nietzche would just think it's what he wrote about Forster.

So that seems to me a problem.

I'll probably get some all-caps slogan and banned.

Used to it by now.

Ride that tiger.

Bro.

"The State is under the masculine aegis, while “society” and, by extension, the people, or demos, are under the feminine aegis. Once again, this is a primordial truth. The maternal domination, from which the political-virile principle subtracts itself, was also understood as the domination of Mother Earth and the Mothers of life and fertility, under whose power and tutelage existence was believed to unfold in its physical, biological, and collective-material aspects. The common mythological background is that of the duality of the luminous and heavenly deities, who are the gods of the political and heroic world on the one hand, and of the feminine and maternal deities of naturalistic existence, who were loved by the plebeian strata of society on the other hand. Thus, even in the ancient Roman world, the idea of State and of imperium (i.e., of the sacred authority) was strictly connected to the symbolic cult of the virile deities of heaven, of light and of the super-world in opposition to the dark region of the Mothers and the chthonic deities. "

It shouldn't be necessary to point out this is opposed to libertarianism, anarchism, and muh local government.

Nor does it support the alt-right method of idealizing a category of the foundational Material.